期刊文献+

作为政策工具的国有企业与国企改革:基于预算软约束的视角 被引量:27

State-Owned Enterprises as Policy Instruments and SOE Reform: Perspective of Soft Budget Constraint
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文基于一个扩展的预算软约束模型,研究国有企业承担政府职能以后的预算软约束和道德风险问题,以及政府面临这些问题的最优对策。本文认为,预算软约束和道德风险等国企问题的出现,是政府主动追求非经济性的政策收益的结果;而政府愿意对国有企业进行实质性的市场化改革,则是因为这些企业不能为政府提供有价值的政策收益。因此,我国上一轮国有企业改革,实际上是政府调整非经济性的政策收益和预算软约束、道德风险等国企问题之间平衡关系的过程。基于此视角,我们可以对一边是"国退民进"另一边却是"国进民退"、一边是市场化改革另一边是央企垄断地位不断强化这些看似互相矛盾的国企改革现象给出一个统一而且内部逻辑一致的解释,并对我国下一轮国有企业改革方向提供有价值的思考。 Based on an extended model of soft budget constraint,this paper researched the problems of soft budget constraint and moral hazard in state-owned enterprises burdened with government goals,and how the government would counter these SOE problems. According to our research,SOE problems originate from the government’s motivation to pursue political benefit,and marketed-oriented reform of SOE begins only when these enterprises failed to provide the government with political benefit. Therefore,the essence in the last round of SOE reform in China was to balance against SOE problems when the government pursued political benefit from state-owned enterprises. From this perspective,we could give a uniform and logically consistent explanation for many seemly contradictory phenomena in the process of China’s SOE reform.
作者 徐朝阳
出处 《中国软科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第3期32-44,共13页 China Soft Science
基金 国家自然科学基金青年基金项目(项目号:71103037) 教育部"新世纪优秀人才支持计划" 北京高等学校"青年英才计划" 对外经济贸易大学"优秀青年学者计划"联合资助
关键词 政府职能 预算软约束 政府行为 国企改革 government goals soft budget constraint government behaviors SOE reform
  • 相关文献

参考文献23

  • 1张维迎,吴有昌,马捷.公有制经济中的委托人—代理人关系:理论分析和政策含义[J].经济研究,1995,30(4):10-20. 被引量:369
  • 2ALCHIAN A. Some economics of property rights [J ]. Eco- nomic Forces at Work, 1965:294 -307.
  • 3VICKERS J, Yarrow G. Economic perspectives on privati- zation[ J ]. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1991,5 ( 2 ) : 111 - 132.
  • 4CAVES D. , CHRISTENSEN L. The relative efficiency of public and private finns in a competitive environment:the case of Canadian railroads [ J ]. Journal of Political Economy, 1980, 88(5) :958 -976.
  • 5SHAPIRO C, WILLIG R. Economic rationales for the scope of privatization[ Z]. Olin Program Discussion Paper 41, Wood- row Wilson School ,Princeton University, 1990.
  • 6SHLEIFER A, VISHNY R. Politicians and finns [ J]. Quar- terly Journal of Economics, 1994,109(4) :995 - 1025.
  • 7HORNER J, NGAI R, OLIVEqTI C. Public enterprises and labor market performance[J]. International Economic Review, 2007,48 ( 2 ) : 363 - 384.
  • 8KOPPELL J. Political control for China's state - owned en- terprises :lessons from America's experience with hybrid organi- zations [ J ]. Governance, 2007,20 ( 2 ) : 255 - 278.
  • 9尹志超,甘犁.公共部门和非公共部门工资差异的实证研究[J].经济研究,2009,44(4):129-140. 被引量:138
  • 10KORNAI J. The soft budget constraint[ J ]. Kyklos, 1986, 39(1) :3 -30.

共引文献2199

同被引文献550

引证文献27

二级引证文献247

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部