肱骨近端加压锁定板治疗肱骨近端骨折

Efficacy of pressurized proximal humerus proximal humeral locking plate fractures

目的：比较肱骨近端加压锁定钢板（ LPHP ）与传统钢板治疗肱骨近端骨折的临床疗效。方法选取肱骨近端骨折患者58例，根据治疗方式不同分为两组，治疗组32例行加压锁定钢板治疗，对照组26例行传统的T型钢板、三叶草钢板治疗。根据Neer功能评分对两组患者术后恢复和并发症情况进行比较。结果58例患者均获得11～15个月的随访，治疗组未发现螺钉及钢板断裂、骨折不愈合、肱骨头坏死，4例肩关节疼痛活动受限；Neer功能评分优15例，良12例，可5例，优良率84．4％。对照组有3例患者螺钉松动、2例钢板断裂、3例骨折不愈合、2例肱骨头坏死、7例肩关节疼痛活动受限；Neer功能评分优6例，良9例，可3例，差8例，优良率57．7％。两组优良率差异有统计学意义（χ2＝5．113，P＜0．05）。结论相比传统钢板，LPHP治疗肱骨近端骨折固定确切、并发症少，有利于患者早期进行康复锻炼。

Objective To observe the clinical efficacy of relatively proximal humeral locking compression plate（ LPHP） with the traditional plate for treatment of proximal humeral fractures .Methods The proximal humeral fractures in patients with 58 cases,the patients were divided into two groups ,the treatment group of 32 cases of locking compression plate in the treatment of T plate ,clover plate in the treatment of 26 patients of the control group received traditional.According to the Neer score compared with two groups of patients with postoperative recovery and compli -cations.Results All the 58 patients for 11 ~15 months of follow-up,the treatment group found no fracture ,fracture nonunion,screw and plate humeral head necrosis ,4 cases of shoulder pain was limited;15 cases of excellent score Neer function,good in 12 cases,5 cases,the excellent and good rate was 84.4%.The control group had 3 cases,2 ca-ses of screw loosening of plate fracture ,3 cases of nonunion ,2 cases of humeral head necrosis ,7 cases of shoulder pain limited.6 cases of excellent score Neer function ,good in 9 cases,3 cases,poor in 8 cases,the excellent and good rate was 57.7%.There was significant differences between the two groups （χ2 =5.113,P ＆lt;0.05） excellent rate. Conclusion LPHP exact treatment of proximal humeral fractures has fewer complications , which can help patients with early rehabilitation exercises .