期刊文献+

基于混合型输入整形的一种三自由度并联机器人抑振的灵敏度分析 被引量:1

Sensitivity analysis to vibration suppression of a 3-DOF parallel manipulator based on the hybrid input shaping
下载PDF
导出
摘要 输入整形控制策略能有效减少机器人的残余振动。其抑制振动的性能可通过分析鲁棒性获得,鲁棒性代表了整形器抑制振幅的能力和抑振频率的范围,能力和范围可通过灵敏度曲线获得。介绍了基于时间优化的混合型多模态单位幅度负脉冲输入整形器的基本原理和灵敏度分析方法,并应用到一种3-DOF并联机器人。通过数值仿真分析了不灵敏度,并探讨了不同类型的脉冲对混合型输入整形器灵敏度的影响。结果表明,混合型多模态单位幅度负脉冲输入整形器的鲁棒性要好于单模态的输入整形器,以新方法建立的UMNZV-UMNZVD输入整形器的鲁棒性和抑振特性最好。而且不同类型的脉冲会影响混合型输入整形器的鲁棒性,ZV-ZVD类混合型整形器具有最好的综合性能。 Input shaping is an effective control strategy to reduce residual vibration of robot system .The performance of input shap-ers can be evaluated by analyzing the robustness of input shaper .The robustness represents the ability to reduce the amplitude of vi-bration and the range of the frequency of vibration suppression .This can be obtained by the curves of sensitivity .The method of the hybrid multiple-mode input shaper with unit amplitude negative impulses based on time-optimization are introduced ,and the meth-ods of sensitivity calculation are also presented .These methods are applied in a 3-DOF parallel robot .The insensitivities of the input shapers are analyzed by using numerical simulations .The effects of the hybrid input shapers with different types of impulses are studied.The results show that the robustness of the new input shapers is better than single-mode input shapers .The robustness of UMNZV-UMNZVD is the best in the input shapers by the new method .Furthermore,different types of impulses will affect the ro-bustness of the hybrid input shapers .The hybrid input shapers with ZV-ZVD possesses the best synthesized performance .
作者 李兵 魏玉兰
出处 《现代制造工程》 CSCD 北大核心 2014年第4期30-35,共6页 Modern Manufacturing Engineering
基金 浙江省自然科学基金项目(LQ12E05008) 湖州市科技攻关基金项目(2012GG03)
关键词 混合 输入整形 多模态 灵敏度 减振 hybrid input shaping multi-mode sensitivity vibration suppression
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1毕树生,梁杰,战强,杜宝瑞,冯子明.机器人技术在航空工业中的应用[J].航空制造技术,2009,52(4):34-39. 被引量:47
  • 2Sadettin Kapucu, Nihat Y, Hakan Yavuz. Suppression of re- sidual vibration of a translating-swinging load by a flexible manipulator [ J ]. Mechatronics ,2008 ( 18 ).
  • 3StergiopoulosJ,Tzes A. Adaptive input shaping for nonlinear systems :A case study. In Proceedings of the 13'h Mediterra- nean Conference on Control and Automation [ C ]. Limassol, Cyprus, 2005.
  • 4Singer N C, Pao L Y, Singhose W E. An effcient algorithm for the generation of multiple-mode input shaping sequences. IEEE International Conference on Control Applications [ C ]. Dearborn, MI, 1996.
  • 5MohammedF D, Ziyad N M. Nonlinear input-shaping control- ler for quay-side container crane~ [ J ]. Nonlinear Dynamics, 2006 (45).
  • 6Li B, Wei Y, Zhn S, et al. Hybrid multi-mode input shaping suppresses the vibration of a 3-DOF parallel manipulator. International Conference on Advanced Engineering Materials and Technology [ C ]. Sanya, China,2011.
  • 7Li B,Zhang X, Mills J, et al. Vibration suppression of a 3- PRR flexible parallel manipulator using input shaping. IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation [ C ]. Changchun, China ,2009.
  • 8Singhose W E, Seering W P, Singer N C. Time-optimal nega- tive input shapers [ J ]. Journal of Dynamic Systems, measure- ment, and Control, 1997,119 (2).
  • 9李兵,谢里阳,武滢,魏玉兰.基于时间优化的输入整形法抑制一种3-DOF并联机器人的残余振动[J].组合机床与自动化加工技术,2010(1):1-4. 被引量:1

二级参考文献9

  • 1N. C. Singer, W. P. Seering. Preshaping Command Inputs to Reduce System Vibration[ J]. ASME Journal of Dynamic Systems. 1990,112(2) :76 -82.
  • 2K. Hillsley, S. Yurkovich. Vibration control of a Two-link Flexible Robot Arm [ C ]//IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Sacramento, California. 1991,4: 2121 -2126.
  • 3Kamal Youef-Toumi, Osamuito. A Time Delay Controller for Systems with Unknown Dynamics [ J ]. ASME Journal of Dynamic Systems. 1990,112(1):133-142.
  • 4V. Kapila, A. Tzes, Q. Yan. Close-loop Input Shaping for Flexible Structures Using Time-delay Control [ J ]. Journal of Dynamic System, Measurement, and Control. 2000,122:454 - 460.
  • 5F. D. Mohammed, N. M. Ziyad. Nonlinear Input-Shaping Controller for Quay-Side Container Cranes [ J]. Nonlinear Dynamics. 2006,45 : 149 - 170.
  • 6W. E. Singhose, W. P. Seering, N. C. Singer. Time-Optimal Negative Input Shapers[ J ]. Journal of Dynamic, Measurement, and Control. 1997,119(2):198-205.
  • 7X. Zhang, J. K. Mills, W. L. Cleghorn. Dynamic Modeling and Experimental Validation of a 3-PRR Parallel Manipulator with Flexible Intermediate Links[ J]. Journal of Intelligent and Robotic Systems. 2007,50:323 - 340.
  • 8N. C. Singer. Residual Vibration Reduction in Computer Controlled Machines[ D ]. Cambridge: MIT Artificial Intelligence lab. 1989 : 1 - 252.
  • 9W. E. Singhose, S. Derezinski, N. C. Singer. Extra-insensitive Input Shapers for Controlling Flexible Spacecraft[ J]. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics. 1996,19(2) :285 - 391.

共引文献46

同被引文献1

引证文献1

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部