期刊文献+

检测角对健康立木中应力波传播速度的影响 被引量:2

Effect of Different Detection Angle on Propagation Velocity of Stress Wave in Health Standing Trees
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以东北林业大学实验林场中水曲柳、白桦、落叶松等3种含水率为饱和状态的活立木为研究对象,利用Arbotom应力波测试仪研究了不同检测角度(0°、15°、45°和75°)对应力波传播速度的影响。利用Excel和SPSS软件包,对所得实验数据进行含水率、胸径等因素与应力波传播速度的相关性分析。结果表明,当只有含水率对应力波传播速度影响较大时,检测角为45°可大幅减少含水率对应力波传播速度的影响;当只有胸径对应力波传播速度影响较大时,检测角为75°可大幅减少胸径对应力波传播速度的影响。当含水率和胸径对应力波影响都较大时,根据不同树种采用不同的检测角度来减小含水率和胸径对应力波传播速度的影响;白桦选取检测角为75°,水曲柳和落叶松选取检测角为45°。 The experiment was conducted to study the effect of different detection angles (0°, 15°, 45° and 75° ) on propagation velocity of stress wave in standing trees (Fraxinus mandshurica Rupr. , Betula platyphyUa Suk and Larix gmelinii Rupr) with saturated water content. With stress wave testing equipment, the detection angle should be limited according to the variance of the trees' diameter at the breast height (DBH) and wood moisture content. When the wood moisture contents of trees influence the propogation velocity of stress wave greatly, the detection angle of 45 ° is the optimal angle, and it can reduce the influence of wood moisture content on stress wave velocity in trees. When the influence of trees' DBH is great, the detection angle of 75° is the best angle that can reduce the influence of DBH on stress wave velocity in trees. When DBH and wood moisture contents of trees have a great influence on stress wave velosity, the optimal detection angle depends on tree species. The best detection angle for B. platyphylla Suk is 75°, and 45° for F. mandshurica Rupr. and L. gmelinii Rupr.
出处 《东北林业大学学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2014年第4期105-108,共4页 Journal of Northeast Forestry University
基金 林业公益性行业科研专项重大项目资助(201104007)
关键词 应力波 检测角度 传播速度 活立木 Stress wave Detection angle Propagation velocity Standing trees
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献59

  • 1杨学春,王立海.红松木材结构缺陷对应力波传播参数的影响[J].东北林业大学学报,2005,33(1):30-31. 被引量:16
  • 2王义弘,柴一新,慕长龙.水曲柳的生态学研究[J].东北林业大学学报,1994,22(1):1-6. 被引量:32
  • 3王志同,曹志强,袁卫国.用应力波非破损检测技术检测中密度纤维板弹性模量的研究[J].木材工业,1995,9(5):17-21. 被引量:33
  • 4王朝志,张厚江.应力波用于木材和活立木无损检测的研究进展[J].林业机械与木工设备,2006,34(3):9-13. 被引量:26
  • 5Ross R J, Ward J C, Wolde A T. Identifying batterially infected oak by stress wave nondestructive evaluation, Res. Pap. FPL-RP-52 [ R]. Madison: U. S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory, 1992.
  • 6Ross R J, Ward J C, Wolde A T. Stree Wave nondestructive evaluation of wetwood [ J ]. Forest Products Journal, 1994,44 (7) :79 - 84.
  • 7Ross R J, DeGroot R C, Nelson W J. The Realation between stress wave transmission characteristics and the compressive strength of biologically degraded wood [ J ]. Forest Products journal, 1997,47 (5) :89 -94.
  • 8Yamamoto K, Sulaiman O, Hashim R. Nondestructive detection of heart rot of acacia mangium trees in Malaysia[ J]. Forest Products Journal,1998,48(3) :83 -86.
  • 9Brashaw B K, Wang Xiping, Ross R J. Relationship between stress wave velocities of green and dry veneer[ J]. Forest Product Journal, 2004,54(6) :85 -90.
  • 10Wu Shih-Yin. Stress Wave Propagation Behavior In Lumber and the Application of Stress Wave Techniques In Standing Tree Quality Assessment[ D]. Moscow: University of Idaho,2002.

共引文献171

同被引文献40

引证文献2

二级引证文献22

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部