期刊文献+

绿豆立枯丝核菌研究初报 被引量:2

Preliminary identification of Rhizoctonia solani causing mung bean seedling blight
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本研究通过形态学、菌丝融合群和致病力测定研究,对从河北省石家庄地区绿豆种植区分离的90个立枯丝核菌进行鉴定。在90个分离物中有71个属于AG4,占供试分离物的78.89%,2个属于AG2-2,占供试分离物的2.22%,另外17个分离物与标准菌株不融合,占供试分离物的18.89%;属于AG4的71个分离物中,55个与AG4完全融合(占77.46%),16个与AG4不完全融合(占22.54%)。在温室条件下采用人工接菌法对40个代表性分离物的致病力进行测定,发现不同分离物对同一品种的致病力存在差异,其中分离物R3、R6、R9、R35致病力最强,分离物R23、R31-1致病力最弱。属于AG-4的分离物R3、R6、R9、R35与其他供试分离物致病力差异极显著;属于未知群体的分离物R20、R29和R24之间致病力差异极显著;属于AG2-2的分离物R21、R31-1致病力较弱,且差异不显著。 Ninety isolates of Rhizoctonia solani,collected from the mung bean field in Shijiazhuang region were characterized by morphology,anastomosis group and pathogenicity test.The results showed that all isolates were multinucleate.Seventy-one isolates belonged to the AG4,accounting for 78.89% of the tested isolates,55 isolates were completely fused with AG4 (77.46%),16 strains were incompletely fused with AG4 (22.54%).Two isolates belonged to the AG2-2,accounting for 2.22% There were 17 strains that could not fuse with any standard strains,accounting for 18.89%.Virulence test in greenhouse demonstrated that the isolates R3,R6,R9 and R35 were highly virulent,but isolates R23 and R31-1 were weakly virulent.There were extremely significant difference between the isolates R3,R6,R9,R35 and the others belonging to AG-4,also between the isolates R20,R29 and R24 belonging to unknown group.The isolates R21 and R31-1 belonging to AG2-2 were weakly virulent and had no significant difference in virulence.
出处 《植物保护》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2014年第2期48-52,80,共6页 Plant Protection
基金 国家食用豆产业技术体系(CARS-09) 河北省科技支撑计划课题(11220108D)
关键词 绿豆 立枯丝核菌 菌丝融合群 致病力 mung bean Rhizoctonia solani anastomosis group pathogenicity
  • 相关文献

参考文献24

二级参考文献95

共引文献232

同被引文献41

  • 1王鑫,原向阳,郭平毅,姚满生,王宏富.除草剂土壤处理对绿豆生长发育及产量的影响[J].杂草科学,2006,24(1):26-27. 被引量:2
  • 2王鑫,原向阳,郭平毅,姚满生,王宏富.除草剂对红小豆田杂草防效的研究[J].山西农业大学学报(自然科学版),2006,26(3):267-269. 被引量:9
  • 3赵秀娟,王树桐,张凤巧,杜洪忠,蒋继志.草莓根腐病研究进展[J].中国农学通报,2006,22(8):419-422. 被引量:33
  • 4方中达.植病研究方法[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2007.
  • 5Medina M J J, Miranda L, Domínguez P, et al. Comparison of different chemical and non-chemical alternatives to Methyl Bromide for strawberry in Huelva (Spain)[J]. Journal of Berry Research,2012,2(2):113-121.
  • 6Narro S, Davalos G, Velasquez V, et al. Main strawberry diseases in Irapuato, Guanajuato and Zamora, Michoacan, Mexico[J].Acta Horticulturae,2006,708:167-171.
  • 7Parikka P, Kukkonen S, Hietaranta T, et al. Root damage — a common problem in strawberry production in Finland[J]. Acta Horticulturae,2002,2(567):643-646.
  • 8邓明琴,孙宝贵,黄桂菊.草莓两种土壤真菌病害的发现及调查研究[J].中国果树,1984,3:46-50.
  • 9Xiao C L, Mackenzie S J, Legard D E. Genetic and pathogenic analyses of Colletotrichum gloeosporioides isolates from strawberry and noncultivated hosts[J]. Phytopathology,2004,94(5):446-453.
  • 10徐淑华,蒋继志,郝志敏.河北满城地区草莓根腐病病原真菌的分离鉴定[A].//中国植物病理学会.中国植物病理学会2004年学术年会论文集[C].北京:中国农业科学技术出版社,2004:68-71.

引证文献2

二级引证文献36

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部