期刊文献+

R软件调用OpenBUGS软件实现网状Meta分析 被引量:11

Calling OpenBUGS Sot ware from R Language for Performing Network Meta-analysis
原文传递
导出
摘要 R软件当前可通过R2OpenBUGS程序包、BRugs程序包和rbugs程序包来调用OpenBUGS程序包实现网状Meta分析。本文分别对这3种程序包实现网状Meta分析的过程进行演示。从结果来看,3种程序包的计算结果相近,但rbugs程序包无绘图功能,仅R2OpenBUGS程序包能绘制森林图。 R language could call OpenBUGS software for performing network meta-analysis using R2OpenBUGS package, BRugs package, and rbugs package. In this paper, we introduced how to implement network meta-analysis using these three packages. The results show that the computed results are similar for the three packages; however, the rbugs package could not draw the plot, only R2OpenBUGS package could draw forest plot.
出处 《中国循证医学杂志》 CSCD 2014年第4期492-496,共5页 Chinese Journal of Evidence-based Medicine
基金 湖北省教育科学"十二五"规划2012年度重点课题(编号:2012A050) 湖北医药学院2011年度优秀中青年科技创新团队项目(编号:2011CZX01) 湖北医药学院附属太和医院2013年循证医学"苗圃基金"项目(EBM2013004)
关键词 R软件 R2OpenBUGS程序包 BRugs程序包 rbugs程序包 网状Meta分析 R language R2OPenBUGS package BRugs package rbugs package Network meta-analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献51

  • 1Bayes T. An essay towards solving a problem in the doctrine ofchances [J]. Phil Trans, 1763,53:370-418.
  • 2Spiegelhalter DJ.Freedman LS.Parmar MKH. Bayesian Approaches loRandomized Trials [J|. J H Statist Soc,1994.157(3):357-416.
  • 3Smith TC, Spiegelluilter DJ. Thomas A. Bayesian approaches torandom-effects nn*ta-analysis: a comparative study [JJ. StatMed,1995.14(24):2685-99.
  • 4张尧庭,陈汉峰.贝叶斯统汁推爾[M].北京:科学出版社.1991.
  • 5Warn DK.Thompson SG,Spiegelhalter DJ. Bayesian randomeffects meta-analysis of trials with binary outcomes: methods.for the absolute risk difference and telalive risk scales [J], StatMed,2002;21(11):1601-23.
  • 6Cariin JB. Meta-analysis for 2x2 tables: a Bayesian approach [J].Stat Med, 1992.11(2):141-58.
  • 7Colditz GAJirewer TF,Berkey CS,et al. Effii-acy of BCG vaccinein the prevention of tuberculosis. Meta-analvsis of the jjuhlishedliterature [J]. J A M A. 1994,271 (9):698-702.
  • 8Song F,Altman DG,Glenny AM,ei al. Validity of indirect comparisonfor estimating efficacy of competing interventions: empirical evidencefrom published meta-analyses [J]. BMJ,2003,326(7387):472.
  • 9Glenny AM,Altman DG,Song F,et al. Indirect comparisons ofcompeting interventions [J]. Health Technol Assess,2005,9(26):1-134,iii-iv.
  • 10Song F,Loke YK,Walsh T,et al. Methodological problems in the use ofindirect comparisons for evaluating healthcare interventions: surveyof published systematic reviews [J]. BMJ,2009,338:b 1147.

共引文献131

同被引文献135

引证文献11

二级引证文献165

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部