摘要
目的观察俯卧位加压选择角度牵引治疗颈源性头痛的疗效。方法治疗组采用俯卧位颈椎加压选择角度牵引,对照组采用坐位式选择角度牵引。结果治疗前两组患者的疼痛、颈椎生理曲度的差异均没有显著性意义(P>0.05),治疗后两组患者的各指标差异存在显著性意义(P<0.05)。结论俯卧位颈椎加压选择角度牵引比坐位式选择角度牵引治疗颈源性头痛的治疗效果更好。
Objective To observe the treatment effect on cervicogenic headache by prone position angles traction with putting pressure on the cervical vertebra. Methods Treatment group were treated by prone position angles traction with putting pressure on the cervical vertebra and the control group were treated by seat position. Results Before treatment there was no significant difference in the pain symptoms and physiology curvature of cervical vertebra between the two groups (P 〉 0.05). There was a significant difference between the two groups after treatment in the pain symptoms and physiology curvature of cervical vertebra (P 〈0. 05). Conclusion The effect of prone position angles traction by putting pressure on the cervical vertebra was better than the seat position in the treatment of cervical headache.
出处
《光明中医》
2014年第4期759-761,共3页
GUANGMING JOURNAL OF CHINESE MEDICINE
关键词
颈源性头痛
角度牵引
颈椎生理曲度
cervicogenic headache
angels traction
physiology curvature of cervical vertebra