摘要
地理标志证明商标与商品商标,在商标标志的构成及商标的功能作用等方面均存在实质性差异,因此,在适用《商标法》第28条对相关商标是否构成使用在相同或类似商品上的近似商标进行判断时,不应将地理标志证明商标与商品商标进行近似性比对。
Geographical indications registered as certification marks are different from trademarks in the composition and the functions of the marks. Applying Article 28 of Trademark Law of the People＇s Republic of China to decide whether the relevant marks are identical or similar used on identical or similar goods, geographical indications registered as or applying for the registration as certification marks should not be compared with trademarks in similarity.
出处
《科技与法律》
2014年第2期340-351,共12页
Science Technology and Law
关键词
地理标志
证明商标
商品商标
商标近似
Geographical Indications
Certification Marks
Trademarks
Similarity.
