期刊文献+

基础主义的批判与奎因的整体主义知识观

Criticism of Fundamentalism and Quine's Holistic View of Knowledge
下载PDF
导出
摘要 基础主义作为人类认识论上一种基本的认识路径,试图寻找一个稳固的根基,并在此基础上建构人类知识的大厦。随着近代数理逻辑的兴盛和分析哲学的进一步发展,这种试图把科学知识建立在逻辑的根基上的现代基础主义再次成为很多哲学家追求的目标。然而,对于盛极一时的古典基础主义,一些哲学家提出了尖锐而严厉的批判;并且现代基础主义在二十世纪五十年代后也受到了激烈的批判,其中奎因的整体主义知识观就是一个有力的代表。 As a basic understanding path of human epistemology, foundationalism always tries to find a solid foundation, and construct a building of human knowledge on this basis. With the rise of mathematical logic and further development of ana- lytic philosophy, modern foundationalism, which tries to put scientific knowledge on the basis of the logical foundation, has become the target of many philosophers. However, for this popular classical foundationalism, many philosophers have done a sharp and harsh criticism, and after the fifties of the twentieth century the modern foundationalism has received lots of fierce criticism, in which Quine's holism view of knowledge is a strong representative.
作者 颜强
出处 《长沙理工大学学报(社会科学版)》 2014年第2期37-40,73,共5页 Journal of Changsha University of Science and Technology:Social Science
关键词 基础主义 奎因 整体主义 认识论 批判 fundamentalism Quine holism epistemology criticism
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1亚里士多德,苗力田主编.亚里士多德全集(第一卷)[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,1990.356.
  • 2[美]梯利.西方哲学史[M].北京:商务印书馆,1995..
  • 3[德]康德.自然科学的形而上学基础[M].上海:三联书店,1988.
  • 4张端信.对传统基础主义的颠覆:皮尔士论可误主义与科学理性[J].湘潭大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2008,32(5):87-90. 被引量:1
  • 5[德]施太格缪勒.当代哲学的主流(下卷)[M].北京:商务印书馆,1986.
  • 6[德]卡尔纳普.世界的逻辑构造[M].上海:上海译文出版社,1999:13.
  • 7[美]奎因.从逻辑的观点看[M].陈启伟,等译,上海:上海译文出版社,1987.
  • 8陈波.奎因哲学研究[M].北京:三联书店,1998..
  • 9Quine W V. Theories and Things[M]. Cambridge, MA: Har- vard University Press, 1981.
  • 10[美]奎因.语词和对象[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2005.

二级参考文献11

  • 1[1]N.Houser,C.Kloesel.The Essential Peirce,Indiana University Press,1992,Volume 1.
  • 2[2]Charles Hartshorne and Paul Weiss,Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce,vols.1-6,Cambridge,Mass.; Harvard University Press,1931-1958,Volume 5.
  • 3[3]Charles Hartshorne and Paul Weiss,Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce,vols.1-6,Cambridge,Mass.; Harvard University Press,1931-1958,Volume 1.
  • 4[4][美]科尼利斯·瓦尔.皮尔士[M].郝长墀,译.北京;中华书局,2003.
  • 5[5]Arthur W.Burks.Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce,vols.7-8,Cambridge,Mass.; Harvard University Press,1931-1958,Volume 7.
  • 6[6]Susan Hacck.Philosophy of Logics.Cambridge University Press,1978.
  • 7[7]Arthur W.Burks.Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce,vols.7-8,Cambridge,Mass.; Harvard University Press,1931-1958,Volume 8.
  • 8[8]Charles Hartshorne and Paul Weiss,Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce,vols.1-6,Cambridge,Mass.; Harvard University Press,1931-1958,Volume 2.
  • 9[9]Charles Hartshorne and Paul Weiss,Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce,vols.1-6,Cambridge,Mass.; Harvard University Press,1931-1958,Volume 4.
  • 10[美]蒯因(Quine,W·) 著,江天骥等.从逻辑的观点看[M]上海译文出版社,1987.

共引文献71

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部