摘要
对性诱剂、昆虫物理诱黏剂、橘小实蝇专用食物引诱剂、橘大实蝇专用食物引诱剂、瓜实蝇专用食物引诱剂5种实蝇诱剂进行比较试验。结果表明,性诱剂诱集橘小实蝇的数量显著多于其余4种诱剂,物理诱黏剂、3种实蝇食诱剂均可同时诱集橘小实蝇、南瓜实蝇和瓜实蝇,诱虫量以瓜实蝇食诱剂和物理诱黏剂最好。性诱剂、诱黏剂和食诱剂各具特点、互有长短,生产应用中可配合使用。
It is the comparative test that five attractants of sex attractant,insect physical attractant,Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel) food attractant,tetradacus citri chen food attractant and Bactrocera (Zeugodacus) cucurbitae food attractant trapped insect pests of Bactrocera. The results showed that the quantities of sex attractant trapping insect pests was significantly more than other attractants. Physical attractant and three kinds of food attractant all can trap Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel), Bactrocera (zeugodacus)tau and Bactrocera(Zeugodacus) cucurbitae.Among them the effect of Bactrocera(Zeugodacus) cucurbitae food attractant and physical attractant trapping insects is best. Sex attractant,insect physical attractant and food attractant which have its own features, advantages and disadvantages can be used cooperatively in production and application.
出处
《南方园艺》
2014年第2期16-18,共3页
Southern Horticulture
基金
贺州市科技成果转化与应用项目(贺科转0945003N)
关键词
性诱剂
昆虫物理诱黏剂
橘小实蝇专用引诱剂
橘大实蝇专用引诱剂
瓜实蝇专用引诱剂
诱集效果
Sex attractant
Insect physical attractant
Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel) food attractant
Tetradacus citri chen food attractant
Bactrocera(Zeugodacus) cucurbitae food attractant
The effects of trapping