刑事二审“全面审查原则”的理性反思

Retrospection on "Principle of Thorough Check-up"of Second Trial in Criminal Law

设立审判程序的目的不仅仅在于发现案件真相，更在于对发生在控辩双方之 间的争端做出一个权威的结论。二审程序存在的合理根据在于为控辩双方再次提供法律救济 的机会。如果二审法院可以无视诉争的范围，而机械地进行貌似公允的全面审查，不仅有悖司 法审判权运作的基本规律和诉讼程序的安定性，最终也将造成诉讼拖延和诉讼效率的下降。 二审法院的审查范围一般应限制在争端双方上诉或抗诉的理由上。

The purpose of regularizing the process of trail is not only to clarify the facts of a case,but also to issue an authoritative judgement over the debates between the offence and defense parties.This is justified bdcause it is yet another opportunity to offer help to both sides.Therefore,the court for a second trial should not simply carry out a seemingly fair but mechanic process of thorough examination of the trial. This is against the basic principle of judicial operation concerning security and process of the lawsuit,which will only result in prolonged lawsuits with low trial should be confined to justification of the appeal from the offence party and counterappeal from the defense Party.