期刊文献+

梁启超司法理念中的国家本位观

Liang Qichao's Nation-Central Notion in His Judicial Concept
下载PDF
导出
摘要 对梁启超司法观念的分析不能脱离于梁氏对西方宪政思想改造的理论框架,寻此脉络可以明晰梁氏宪政理念中对待司法的态度,带有国家本位意识突显于三权分立中的司法限权功能的特征。对外而言,司法独立首先体现为国家主权的独立,也即对领事裁判权的收回。对内而言表现为三方面,第一国家权力的收敛与集中优位于对政府权力的限制;第二倚重行政权与立法权之间权力制衡,司法权功能被旁置;第三,民权让位于司法权力的统一与司法治理。 Analysis of Liang Qichao's judicial concept can't be divorced from his the theoretical framework of the constitutional reform, look this context can clear found his attitude towards the judicature which emphasized nation-central notion in separation of powers. His judicial concept represents in two aspects. Externally, Liang Qichao thought independence of judicature required national sovereignty independence, which means the recovery for consular jurisdiction. Internally, national limits on the powers of the authority of government should be located at first. Secondly, the legislative power is regarded as second-rate power. Thirdly, unified judicial power and judicial governance should be valued.
作者 李鹰
出处 《时代法学》 2014年第2期73-78,共6页 Presentday Law Science
基金 国家2011计划"司法文明协同创新"相关研究成果
关键词 梁启超法治思想 司法改革 国家本位 Liang Qichao's judicial concept judicial reform nation-central notion
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1胡适.介绍我自己的思想[A].中国现代政治思想史料选集(上册)[C].成都:四川人民出版社,1993.210.
  • 2梁启超.新民说[A].饮冰室合集(第4册)[C].北京:中华书局,2011.5.
  • 3梁启超.敬告政党及政党员[A].饮冰室合集(第4册)[C].北京:中华书局,2011.21.
  • 4梁启超.论自由[A].饮冰室合集(第4册)[C].北京:中华书局,2011.73.
  • 5梁启超.西学书目表后序[A].饮冰室合集(第1册)[C].北京:中华书局,2011.128.
  • 6徐崇利.冲突法之本位探讨[J].法律科学(西北政法大学学报),2006,24(5):51-61. 被引量:5
  • 7沈大明.梁启超与中国法制的现代化[J].上海交通大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2002,10(3):71-77. 被引量:4
  • 8梁启超.政治学大家伯伦知理之学说[A].饮冰室合集(第2册)[C].北京:中华书局,2011.86-88.
  • 9梁启超.治标财政策[A].饮冰室文集(第4册)[C].北京:中华书局,2011.64-65.
  • 10梁启超.说常识[A].饮冰室合集(第3册)[C].北京:中华书局,2011.39.

二级参考文献28

  • 1徐崇利.全面运用最密切联系原则——健全和完善我国冲突法立法的一大抉择[J].法学,1993(2):21-23. 被引量:3
  • 2李秀清.“梁启超宪草”与民国初期宪政模式的选择[J].现代法学,2001,23(6):21-34. 被引量:13
  • 3利·布里梅耶 杰克·戈德史密斯.冲突法:案例与资料[M].北京:中信出版社,2003.333.
  • 4S, C. Symeonides (ed.), private International Law at the End of the 20th Century; Progress or Regress? Kluwer Law International, 2000, pp. 65 - 66, 151 - 152.
  • 5S. C. Symeonides (ed.), Private International Law at the Endof the 20th Century: Progress or Regress?, Kluwer Law International,2000, pp. 65 - 66, 151 - 152, 320.
  • 6L. Brilmayer. Conflict of Laws, Little, Brown and Company, 1995, pp. 41-46, 115 - 118.
  • 7D. McClean, Morris: The Conflict of Law, Sweet & Maxwell, 2000, pp. 549-550, 551.
  • 8K. Hutchings, International Political Theory: Rethinking Ethics in a Global Era, SAGE Publications, 1999, p. 38.
  • 9P. Hamel, H. Lustiger- Thaler, J. N. Pieterse & S. Roseneil,Globalization and Social Movements, Chapter 3 "Retrieving Civil Society?Social Movements and the Challenge of Global Politics from Below", Palgrave, 2001, pp. 63-69.
  • 10G. Kegel. Paternal Home and Dream: Traditional Conflict of Laws and the American Reformers. American Journal of Comparative Law, Vol. 27, 1979.

共引文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部