期刊文献+

相对技术差异对贸易结构的影响有多大? 被引量:1

How Large is the Impact of Relative Technological Differences on Trade Structure?
原文传递
导出
摘要 对李嘉图相对优势理论的检验是指从经验上研究相对技术差异对贸易结构的影响有多大。Costinot、Donaldson和Komunjer开创性地建立了具有坚实理论基础的计量检验模型,并对李嘉图理论进行了经验验证。文章旨在拓展Costinot、Donaldson和Komunjer的研究样本,将发展中新兴大国加入进去,并增加产业种类,重新研究相对技术差异对贸易结构的影响程度。研究结果表明,相对技术差异对贸易结构具有重要的影响作用,但其正向影响要小于已有文献的估计,甚至出现了抑制贸易结构的情形。 The test of Ricardo's theory of comparative advantage is to empirically study the impact of relative technological differences on trade structure. Costinot et al. creatively builds an econometrical test model that has a solid theoretical foundation, and then makes a corresponding empirical study on Ricardo' s theory. The paper aims to expand the research sample of Costinot et al. such as adding emerging economies into the sample, and expanding the kind of industries. The result is that, relative technological differences are an important determinant of trade structure. However, the impact is not as large as the previous literature' s results. Besides, it may even suppress trade structure.
作者 薛蕊 苏庆义
出处 《国际经贸探索》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第4期4-13,74,共11页 International Economics and Trade Research
关键词 李嘉图理论 相对技术差异 贸易结构 影响程度 Ricardo's theory relative technological difference trade structure impact
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1梁碧波.技术进步、制度变迁与国际贸易模式演进:一个分析框架[J].国际经贸探索,2013,29(12):4-16. 被引量:9
  • 2苏庆义.贸易结构决定因素的分解:理论与经验研究[J].世界经济,2013,36(6):36-58. 被引量:11
  • 3苏庆义.2013b-08-21.转变开放战略:从比较优势到绝对优势[N].中国社会科学报.
  • 4周骏宇,杨军.广东外贸企业的困境、转型升级路径和政策需求——基于结构方程的实证分析[J].国际经贸探索,2013,29(4):4-15. 被引量:10
  • 5Akanbi, O A. and Jordaan, A. C. 2008. The Recardian Theory of Comparative Advantage between South Africa and the USA in the Manufacturing Sector [J]. Journal for Studies in Economics & Econometrics, 32(2): 25-43.
  • 6Balassa, B. 1963. An Empirical Demonstration of Classical Comparative Cost Theory [J]. Review of Economics and Statistics, 45 (3): 231-238.
  • 7Carlin, W., Glyn, A. and Reenen, J. V. 2001. Export Market Performance of OECD Countries: An Empirical Examination of the Role of Cost Competitiveness [J]. Economic Journal, 111(468):128-162.
  • 8Costinot, A. 2009. An Elementary Theory of Comparative Advantage [J]. Econometrica, 77 (4): 1165-1192.
  • 9Costinot, A. and Donaldson D. 2012. Ricardo's Theory of Comparative Advantage: Old Idea, New Evidence [J]. American Economic Review, 102 (3): 453-458.
  • 10Costinot, A., Donaldson D. and Komunjer I. 2012. What Goods Do Countries Trade? A Quantitative Exploration of Ricardo's Ideas [J]. Review of Economic Studies, 79 (2): 581-608.

二级参考文献72

  • 1张军,吴桂英,张吉鹏.中国省际物质资本存量估算:1952—2000[J].经济研究,2004,39(10):35-44. 被引量:5561
  • 2隆国强.加工贸易发展问题研究[J].国际贸易,2006(9):4-8. 被引量:57
  • 3恩格斯.家庭、私有制和国家的起源[M]..马克思恩格斯选集(第4卷)[C].人民出版社,1972..
  • 4白重恩 谢长泰 钱颖一.中国的资本回报率.比较,2007,(1).
  • 5David Geece, Gary Pisano, Amy Shuen. 1997. Dynamic Capabilities and Strategy Management [J].Strategic Management Journal, 18 (7):17-19.
  • 6Gereef I G, Humphery J, Sturgeon G. 2003.The Governance of Global Value Chains [R]. Duke University Working paper.
  • 7Humphrey J, Schmitz H. 2000. Governance and Upgrading: Linking Industrial Cluster and Global Value Chain Research JR]. IDS Working Paper No.120.Brighton: Institute of Development Studies, University of Sussex.
  • 8Jonathan D. Day,Michael Jung. 2000. Corporate Transformation without a Crisis[J].The Mckinsey Quarterly,(4):1-10.
  • 9林毅夫、蔡防、李周(1994):《中国的奇迹:发展战略与经济改革》,上海人民出版社.
  • 10[瑞典]伯特尔·俄林(2008):《区际贸易与国际贸易》(逯宇铎等译),华夏出版社.

共引文献27

同被引文献41

引证文献1

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部