期刊文献+

论公权私化的本质及其扼制——对一个行政应用伦理前沿问题的破解

Privatization of Public Power:Its Nature and the Means to Control it——Solution to a New Issue in Applied Administration Ethics
下载PDF
导出
摘要 公权私化是一个行政应用伦理的前沿问题。公权私化的本质是对公共权力的盗窃和掠夺。公务员的权利实质上都是公共权力,公权私化造成的恶果是权力公共性质的破缺,公权私化追求的是一己私利的最大化。古代思想家、资产阶级思想家、马克思主义经典作家都曾对公权私化进行过批判。在市场经济条件下,破除“公权私化”的主要策略是清除“公权私化有理”论的影响,把相关道德上升为法律,变无形约束为有形约束,变软约束为硬约束,变晚约束为早约束。 Privatization of public power is a frontier issue in the studies of applied administrative ethics. Privatization of public power is by nature a stealing and a robbing of public powers. Powers enjoyed by civil servants are public, whose privatization results in damages to their public property, as the goal of pursuing such privatization is to maximize the pursuer' private interests. Privatization of public power has been criticized by ancient thinkers, bourgeoisie ideologists and classic Marxist writers alike. Under the conditions of market econ- omy, the major strategy of eliminating privatization of public power is to erase the influence of reasonableness of privatizing public power, to uplift ethical principles to the level of legality, as well as to turn intangible con- straints into tangible ones, soft constraints into hard ones and belated constraints into timely ones.
作者 肖新生
出处 《广东培正学院学报》 2014年第1期41-45,52,共6页 Journal of Guangdong Peizheng College
关键词 公权私化 道德约束 法律制约 对策 privatization of public power ethical Constraints legal Constraints strategy
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1亚里士多德.政治学[M].北京:商务印书馆,1965.132.
  • 2.马克思恩格斯选集第1卷[M].北京:人民出版社,1995..
  • 3列宁全集:第6卷[M].北京:人民出版社,1995:463.
  • 4与总书记谈心[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,1996:267-277.
  • 5李大钊选集[M].北京:人民出版社,1959.
  • 6洛易·弗越.给M·维尔曼的信1843年8月[M]//载宗教·历史·政治和文学文集(1856-1868):第1卷,巴黎1876:132-133.
  • 7R.尼斯贝特,李肃东,罗梭永.个人主义[J].世界哲学,1991(2):67-68. 被引量:22

共引文献4677

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部