期刊文献+

时域模型FUNWAVE与SWASH的对比研究 被引量:2

Comparison Between Time Domain Wave Models FUNWAVE and SWASH
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文采用Berkhoff为验证缓坡方程的不同计算方法可信度所使用的地形,对基于Boussinesq方程的FUNWAVE和基于NS方程的SWASH两种时域模型进行了比较分析,通过与实测数据对比,结果显示两种模型都能达到较好的精度,整体上FUNWAVE略好于SWASH,但基于相同的模型设置,SWASH运行速度远远快于FUNWAVE。综合考虑两种模型的精度与运行速度,SWASH模型被认为更具实用性。 In this paper,the bathymetry was applied in the comparison between two time domain wave models FUNWAVE and SWASH. The governing equations of each model were introduced. Both FUNWAVE and SWASH show a good agreement with the experimental measurement,while FUWAVE is a little better than SWASH in general. But SWASH is much faster than FUNWVE,which is believed to be more competitive in the practical use.
出处 《港工技术》 2013年第6期4-6,共3页 Port Engineering Technology
基金 海洋可再生能源专项资金项目(GHME2011ZC04 GHME2012ZC02) 国家自然科学基金项目(41276086)
关键词 Berkhoff地形 时域模型 FUNWAVE SWASH Berkhoff bathymetry time domain model FUNWAVE SWASH
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1Kirby, J. T., Wei, G., Chen, Q., Kennedy, A. B. and Dal- rymple, R. A., FUNWAVE 1.0. Fully nonlinear Boussinesq wave model. Documentation and user's manual [R], Center for Applied Coastal Research, Department of Civil and Envi- romental Engineering, University of Delaware.
  • 2Wei, G. and Kirby, J. T.A time-dependent numerical code for extended Boussinesq equations [J]. Journal of Waterway, Port, Coastal and Ocean Engineering, 1995, 120:251-261.
  • 3The SWASH team. SWASH user manual (version 1.10) [EB/ OL]. Delft: Delft University of Technology, 2010.
  • 4Zijle ma, m., Stelling, G.S. and Smit P. SWASH: An opera- tional public domain code for simulating wave fields and rap- idly varied flows in coastal waters[J]. Coastal Engineering, 2011, 58(10): 992-1012.
  • 5BerkhoffJ.C.W, BooyN, RadderA.C. Verification of numerical wave propagatiomodels for simplehar moniclinear water waves [J].Coastal Eng., 1982, 6(3) : 255-279.

同被引文献20

引证文献2

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部