期刊文献+

胰腺癌淋巴结转移情况与预后关系的研究探讨 被引量:6

Prognosis impact of lymph nodes metastasis in pancreatic cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨胰腺癌淋巴结转移情况对预后的影响。方法回顾性分析2009年1月至2012年12月收治的65例接受胰十二指肠切除术的胰腺癌患者的临床资料,对是否有淋巴结转移、淋巴结清扫数、淋巴结阳性数、淋巴结阳性比率(LNR)等因素分别进行分组分析。生存率采用log-rank检验,采用COX风险回归模型进行多因素分析。结果58例获取随访患者6个月、1年、3年生存率分别为91.0%,74.8%,21.7%,中位生存期14.1个月。单因素分析显示:是否有淋巴结转移、淋巴结转移比率对中位生存期的影响差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),LNR≤0.2较>0.2预后好。在无淋巴结转移组(pN0)中,淋巴结清扫数增多能够显著改善预后(P<0.05),而在淋巴结转移组(pN1)中,淋巴结转移数对于预后无显著影响。对于pN1患者行多因素分析提示:侵透胰腺被膜、LNR是影响预后的独立因素。结论胰腺癌淋巴结转移情况与预后密切相关,淋巴结清扫数在pN0患者能够影响胰腺癌的预后。LNR>0.2是预后的独立影响因素。 Objective To explore the prognosis impact of lymph nodes metastasis in pancreatic cancer. Methods The clinical data of 65 patients with pancreatic cancer who underwent radial panereatectomy from January 2009 to September 2012 were analyzed retrospectively. Patients were categorized into different groups by lymph nodes metastasis status, count of lymph nodes examined, count of positive lymph nodes and lymph nodes ratio (LNR). Log - rank test and Cox proportional hazard models were used to evaluate the prognostic effect. Results Median survival for the overall 58 patients receiving follow - up was 14.1 months with 6 - months, 1 - year and 3 - years survival rate of 91.0% ,74.8% and 21.7% respectively. Univariate analysis showed that there was significant difference in the median survival between the patients with and without lymph nodes metastasis ,and patients with LNR ~〈0.2 had better prognosis than those with LNR 〉0.2 ( P 〈0.05 ). The count of lymph nodes examined was related to the survival significantly in nodes - negative patients ( P 〈 0.05 ), whereas in nodes - positive patients the count of lymph nodes had no effect on survival ( P 〉 0.05 ). Multivariate analysis showed that serosal infiltration and LNR 〉 0, 2 were independent factors of the progno- sis in nodes - positive patients. Conclusion Lymph nodes metastasis is closely related to the prognosis of the pancreatic cancer. The number of lymph nodes examined has significant effect on the prognosis of the nodes - negative pancreatic cancer. LNR 〉 0.2 is independent predictor of the prognosis in the nodes - positive patients.
出处 《临床和实验医学杂志》 2014年第7期578-581,共4页 Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine
关键词 胰腺癌 淋巴结转移 淋巴结阳性比率 预后 Pancreatic cancer Lymph nodes metastasis Lymph nodes ratio Prognosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Slider MB, Chang DC, Cameron JL, et al. Impact of total lymph node count and lymph node ratio on staging and survival after pancreatectomy for pancreatic adedocarcinoma: a large - population - based analysis [J]. Ann Surg Oneol, 2008,15(1 ) :165 -174.
  • 2Zacharias T, Jaeck D, Oussoultzoglou E, et al. Impact of lymph node involvement on long - term survival after RO panereaticoduodenectomy for ductal ed of the pancreas [ J ]. J Gastrointest Surg 2007,11 (3) :350 - 356.
  • 3Fujita T, Nakagohri T, Gotohda N, et al. Evaluation of the prognostic factors and significance of lymph node status in invasive ductal carcino- ma of the body or tail of the pancreas[ J]. Pancreas, 2010,39 ( 1 ) :e48 -54.
  • 4Schwarz RE, Smith DD. Extent of lymph node retrieval and pancreatic cancer survival:information from a large US population database [ J ]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2006,13(9) :1189 -1200.
  • 5Bhatti I, Peacock O, Awan AK, et al. Lymph node ratio versus number of affected lymph nodes as predictors of survival for resected pancreatic [J]. World J Surg, 2010,34(4) :768 -775.
  • 6张何源,黄鹤光.淋巴结转移情况对胰腺癌预后的影响[J].中国医师进修杂志,2012,35(35):4-8. 被引量:2
  • 7Huebner M, Kendrfck M. Number of lymph nodes evaluated : prognostic value in pancreatic adenocarcinoma[ J]. J Gastrointest Surg, 2012,16 (5) :920 - 926.
  • 8Sierzega M, Popiela T, Kulig J, et al. The ratio of metastatic/resected lymph nodes is an independent prognostic factor in patients with node - positive pancreatic head cancer [ J ]. Pancreas, 2006,33 ( 3 ) : 240 - 245.
  • 9Riediger H, Keek T, Wellner U, et al. The lymph node rmio is the strongest prognostic factor after resection of pancreatic cancer [ J ]. J Gastruintest Surg, 2009,13 (7) : 1337 - 1344.
  • 10Sohn TA, Yeo CJ, Cameron JL. Resected adenocarcinoma of the pan- creas - 616 patients: results, outcomes, and prognostic indicators [ J ]. Gastrointest Surg, 2000,4(6) :567 -579.

二级参考文献26

  • 1Brian Kim-Poh Goh,Yu-Meng Tan,Yaw-Fui Alexander Chung.Utility of fusion CT-PET in the diagnosis of small pancreatic carcinoma[J].World Journal of Gastroenterology,2005,11(24):3800-3802. 被引量:5
  • 2Callery MP,Chang KJ,Fishman EK,et al.Pretreatment assessment of resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer:expert consensus statement.Ann Surg Oncol,2009,16:1727-1733.
  • 3Katz MH,Pisters PW,Evans DB,et al.Borderline resectable pancreatic cancer:the importance of this emerging stage of disease.J Am Coll Surg,2008,206:833-846.
  • 4Gillen S,Schuster T,Meyer Zum Büschenfelde C,et al.Preoperative/neoadjuvant therapy in pancreatic cancer:a systematic review and meta-analysis of response and resection percentages.PLoS Med,2010,7:e1000267.
  • 5Hidalgo M.Pancreatic cancer.N Engl J Med,2010,362:1605-1617.
  • 6Müller SA,Hartel M,Mehrabi A,et al.Vascular resection in pancreatic cancer surgery:survival determinants.J Gastrointest Surg,2009,13:784-792.
  • 7Tseng JF,Raut CP,Lee JE,et al.Pancreaticoduodenectomy with vascular resection:margin status and survival duration.J Gastrointest Surg,2004,8:935-949.
  • 8Conroy T,Desseigne F,Ychou M,et al.Randomized phase Ⅲ trial comparing FOLFIRINOX (F:5FU/leucovorin[LV] ,irinotecan[I] ,andoxaliplatin[O] ) versus gemcitabine (G) as first-line treatment for metastaticpancreatic adenocarcinoma (MPA):Preplanned interim analysis results of the PRODIGE 4/ACCORD 11 trial.J Clin Oncol,2010,28:4010.
  • 9Neoptolemos JP,Stocken DD,Bassi C,et al.Adjuvant chemotherapy with fluorouracil plus folinic acid vs gemcitabine following pancreatic cancer resection:a randomized controlled trial.JAMA,2010,304:1073-1081.
  • 10Slidell MB, Chang DC, Cameron JL, et al. Impact of total lymph node count and lymph node ratio on staging and survival after pancreatectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a large,population-based analysis. Ann Surg Oncol, 2008,15 ( 1 ) : 165- 174.

共引文献25

同被引文献38

引证文献6

二级引证文献28

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部