期刊文献+

基于抽象解释和数值熵的数值程序分析方法

Value Range Analysis Method Based on Abstract Interpretation and Value Entropy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在高度依赖软件的信息时代,程序的正确性验证问题需要深入研究。文中提出了基于抽象解释和数值熵的数值程序正确性分析方法。抽象解释理论为程序静态分析提供了一个通用框架,在编译时能够自动地推导程序的动态性质。数值信息熵能够反映变量的值范围,通过熵值的大小可以判断变量取值是否在规定范围内。通过一个C程序对该方法进行了验证,该数值程序分析方法可以做到对程序正确性等的验证,并且较单纯地抽象解释近似分析,正确性、可靠性更高。 In the information age, software is highly dependent, thus the correctness of the program validation issues need to be further study. In the paper,introduce the value range analysis method based on abstract interpretation and value information entropy. The abstract interpretation as an important method of the static analysis, uses testing framework to deduce the program' s dynamic property automati- cally. The value information entropy can reflect the range of a variable ,through the entropy,can judge whether variable values within the prescribed scope. Through validating this method with C program, find the method can validate the correctness of the running program. Compared with the only abstract interpretation analysis, the method is higher in validity and reliability.
出处 《计算机技术与发展》 2014年第4期57-59,64,共4页 Computer Technology and Development
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(60674100) 南京航空航天大学基本科研业务费专项科研项目(NS2010069)
关键词 数值程序分析 正确性 抽象解释 数值信息熵 value range analysis correctness abstract interpretation value information entropy
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

二级参考文献104

  • 1樊玮,陈增强,袁著祉.基于Agent的分布式数据库设计及其在飞行计划系统中的应用[J].南开大学学报(自然科学版),2004,37(3):49-54. 被引量:3
  • 2刘树锟,阳小华.动态不变量检测工具Daikon的分析及运用[J].电脑开发与应用,2006,19(1):6-8. 被引量:2
  • 3Cousot P, Cousot R. Abstract interpretation: A unified lattice model for static analysis of programs by construction or approximation of fixpoints. In: Proc. of the 4th POPL. New York: ACM Press, 1977.238-252.
  • 4Cousot P. The verification grand challenge and abstract interpretation. In: Meyer B, Woodcock J, eds. Verified Software: Tools, Theories, Experiments (VSTTE 2005). LNCS 417 1, Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2008. 189-201.
  • 5Min6 A. Weakly relational numerical abstract domains [Ph.D. Thesis]. Paris: Ecole Normale Superieure, 2004.
  • 6Li MJ, Li ZJ, Chen HW. Program verification techniques based on the abstract interpretation theory. Journal of Software, 2008, 19(1):17-26 (in Chinese with English abstract), http://www.jos.org.cn/1000-9825/19/17.htm [doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1001.2008. 0017].
  • 7Cousot P, Cousot R. Static determination of dynamic properties of programs. In: Robinct B, cd. Proc. of the 2nd Int'l Symp. on Programming. Paris: Dunod, 1976. 106-130.
  • 8Cousot P, Halbwachs N. Automatic discovery of linear restraints among variables of a program. In: Proc. of the 5th POPL. New York: ACM Press, 1978.84-97.
  • 9Mine A. The octagon abstract domain. Higher-Order and Symbolic Computation, 2006,19(1):31-100.
  • 10Simon A, King A, Howe JM. Two variables per linear inequality as an abstract domain. In: Leuschel M, ed. Proc. of the LOPSTR 2002. LNCS 2664, Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2003.71-89.

共引文献37

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部