期刊文献+

论比例原则在国际海洋划界中的功能与缺陷--基于国际司法裁决的考量 被引量:2

The Function of Proportionality in Maritime Delimitation and Its Limits: Some Reflections on the Jurisprudence of International Courts and Tribunals
下载PDF
导出
摘要 根据国际司法裁决,比例原则在海洋划界中的功能可以归纳为两个层面:一是构成调整临时海洋边界线的"相关情况";二是作为海洋划界结果公平性检验的标准。中国有着较长的海岸线,因此在按照公平原则处理与周边邻国的海洋划界纠纷时,比例原则将发挥重要作用。但是,国际司法裁决并没有阐明需要调整临时海洋边界线的"海岸线长度差异"的判断标准,以及成比例检验出现"重大比例失衡"的检验标准,国际司法机构在此方面拥有很大的自由裁量权。因此,为克服比例原则适用时的主观性问题,未来的国际司法裁决不妨适当引入量化标准,以确保海洋划界结果的公平性和可预测性。 In accordance with the jurisprudence of international courts and tribunals, the role of proportionality in maritime delimitation can be summarized as two aspects : first, it constitutes one of the i relevant circumstances' necessary to adjust the provisional delimitation line ; second, it plays a certain role in the ' proportionality test' stage as a verification of equity. Therefore, given its long coastal lines, the proportionality should play a significant role in China's settlement of the disputes over maritime boundaries with its neighbors. However, in the case law of international adjudication, there are no criteria which can be utilized to determine the exact degree of the ' difference of coastal lengths ' calling for adjustment of provisional delimitation lines, or the 'significant disproportion' in the final proportionality test. In contrast, the interna- tional judicial bodies themselves enjoy great discretion. Therefore, with an aim to overcome the problem of subjectivity, in- teroational adjudication in the future may introduce more quantitative criteria so as to improve the legal certainty in the field of maritime delimitation.
作者 张华
出处 《南洋问题研究》 CSSCI 2014年第1期9-17,共9页 Southeast Asian Affairs
基金 南京大学2010年度人文社科基金青年项目“国际海洋法与中国海洋权益的维护” 南京大学“985三期”
关键词 比例原则 海洋划界 国际司法裁决 国际海洋法 proportionality, maritime delimitation, international adjudication, international law of the sea
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1North Sea Continental Shelf, Judgment, I. C.J. Reports 1969, p. 3 ( hereinafter ' North Sea' ), paras. 98, 101 (D) (3).
  • 2Case concerning the delimitation of continental shelf between the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ire- land, and the French Republic, Decision of 30 June 1977, Report of International Arbitral Awards (RIAA) , Volume XVIII, pp. 3-129 (hereinafter ' Anglo-French Continental Shelf Arbitration' ), Dara. 99. 101.
  • 3Delimitation of the Maritime Boundary in the Gulf of Maine Area, Judgment, I. C. J. Reports 1984, p. 246 ( herein- after ' Gulf of Maine) , para. 185.
  • 4Arbitration between Barbados and the Republic of Trinidad and Tobago, relating to the delimitation of the exclu- sive economic zone and the continental shelf between them, decision of 11 April 2006, RIAA, Volume XXII, pp. 147- 251 (hereinafter 'Barbados/Trinidad and Tobago'), paras. 337-338, 373-374.
  • 5Maritime Delimitation in the Black Sea (Romania v. Ukraine), Judgment, ICJ Reports 2009, p. 61 (here- inafter 'Black Sea' ), para. 122,210-213, 214-216.
  • 6Dispute concerning delimitation of the maritime boundary between Bangladesh and Myanmar in the Bay of Bengal ( Bangladesh/Myanmar), ITLOS Judgment of 14 March 2012 ( hereinafter ' Bay of Bengal' ), para. 477,497-499.
  • 7Territorial and Maritime Dispute ( Nicaragua v. Colombia), ICJ Judgment, 19 November 2012 ( hereinafter ' Nicara- gua v. Columbia' ) , paras. 190-193,209-211,239-247.
  • 8Malcolm D. Evans, Relevant Circumstances and Maritime Delimitation, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1989, pp. 151- 153.
  • 9Gulf of Maine, paras. 216, 221-222.
  • 10Continental Shelf (Libyan Arab Jarnahiriya/Malta), Judgment, I. C.J. Reports 1985, p. 13 (hereinafter 'Libya/ Malta' ), para. 68, 71-73.

二级参考文献23

  • 1Barbados / Trinidad and Tobago, Award of the Arbitral Tribunal (PCA) , 11 April 2006 ( " Barbados/Trin- idad and Tobago Arbitration" ).
  • 2Guyana / Suriname, Award of the Arbitral Tribunal (PCA) , 17 September 2007 ( "Guyana/Suriname Arbi- tration" ).
  • 3Territorial and Maritime Dispute between Nicaragua and Honduras in the Caribbean Sea (Nicaragua v. Hondu- ras), Judgment, ICJ Reports 2007, p. 659 ("Caribbean Sea").
  • 4Maritime Delimitation in the Black Sea ( Romania v. Ukraine) , Judgment, ICJ Reports 2009, p. 61 ( "Black Sea" ).
  • 5Dispute Concerning Delimitation of the Maritime Boundary between Bangladesh and Myanmar in the Bay of Bengal (Bangladesh/Myanmar) , Judgment of 14 March 2012, ITLOS ( "Bay of Bengal" ).
  • 6See North Sea Continental Shelf [ 19691 ICJ Rep. 3 ("North Sea") , paras. 81, 101.
  • 7See Case Concerning Maritime Delimitation in the Area between Greenland and Jan Mayen (Demark v. Norway), Judgment, ICJ Reports 1993, p. 38 ( "Jan Mayen" ) , para. 56.
  • 8R.R. Churchill and A. V. Lowe, The Law of the Sea (Third Edition) , Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1999, p. 191.
  • 9See Black Sea, paras. 115-121; also Bay ofBeaeal, oara. 233.
  • 10See Prosper Weil, " Geographic Considerations in Maritime Delimitation", in Jonathan I. Charney and Lewis M. Alexander, eds. , International Maritime Boundaries (Volume I) , Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff Publish- ers, 1993, p. 130.

共引文献14

同被引文献52

  • 1Francis Vallat, "The Continental Shelf", British Yearbook of International Law, 1946, p. 336.
  • 2Yoshifumi Tanaka, Predictability and Flexibility in the Law of Maritime Delimitation, Hart Publishing, 2006, p. 161.
  • 3North Sea Continental Shelf, Judsment, I. C. J. Reports, 1969, para. 7.
  • 4Memorial Submitted by the Government of the Federal Re- public of Germany, para. 78.
  • 5North Sea Continental Shelf, Judsment, I. C. J. Reports, 1969, para. 98.
  • 6Reports of International Arbitral Awards, Delimitation of the Continental Shelf between the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, and the French Republic, 1977, para. 26.
  • 7Reports of International Arbitral Awards, Delimitation of the Continental Shelf between the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, and the French Republic, 1977, para. 98.
  • 8North Sea Continental Shelf, Judsment, I. C. J. Reports, 1969,para.100.
  • 9North Sea Continental Shelf, Judsment, I. C. J. Reports, 1969, para.101.
  • 10Continental Shelf (Tunisia/Libyan Arab Jamahiriya) , Judg- ment, I. C.J. Reports, 1982, paras. 97,103 - 104,131.

引证文献2

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部