期刊文献+

倾向指数匹配法在肺癌化疗效果评价中的应用 被引量:9

The Application of Propensity Score Matching in Evaluating Chemotherapeutic Effect of Lung Carcinoma
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的收集临床肺癌病人观测资料,按照临床化疗方法不同将肺癌病人分为NP方案(长春瑞滨+顺铂)和TP方案(紫杉醇+顺铂)两组,用倾向指数匹配法均衡两组间的混杂因素,比较匹配前后差异,评价两种治疗方案的效果。方法采用logistic回归计算肺癌病人的倾向指数,按照倾向指数进行组间卡钳匹配,采用Kaplan-Meier法对匹配后的数据进行分析,用log-rank检验比较两组生存差异。结果匹配前协变量在两组中不均衡,NP方案组和TP方案组的中位生存期分别为2.360年和2.100年,两组生存率无统计学差异(P=0.0516),匹配后协变量在两组中得到很好均衡,NP方案组和TP方案组的中位生存时间分别变为2.560年和2.180年,生存率间有统计学差异(P=0.0134)。结论倾向指数法能够弥补临床观测数据的不足,通过匹配可有效降低组间混杂偏倚,有利于对肺癌患者不同治疗方案疗效做出更准确评价。 Objective The clinical observation data of lung Carcinoma patient were divided into two groups:NP group and TP group according to clinical chemotherapy method. Compared and evaluate treatment effect of two chemotherapy after using propensity score matching method to balance the confounding factors between groups. Methods Calculated each patient's propensity score by logistic re- gression model, and made caliper matching according to the propensity score. The Kaplan-Meier method was applied to make the survival analysis. Results The survival rate was not statistically significant between groups before matching( P = 0. 0516 ), and the median survival time of two groups were 2. 360Y and 2. 100Y. The survival rate was statistically significant after matched by the Propensity Score (P = 0. 0134), and the median survival time of two groups were 2. 560 Y and 2. 180 Y. Conclusion Propensity score matching method can ef- fectively reduce the confounding bias of non-randomized clinical observational data, and help us evaluate the therapeutic effect of Lung Carcinoma patients correctly.
出处 《中国卫生统计》 CSCD 北大核心 2014年第2期190-192,共3页 Chinese Journal of Health Statistics
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(81141112) 山东省自然科学基金资助项目(ZR2013HM045)
关键词 倾向指数 匹配法 肺癌 生存分析 Propensity Score Matching Method Lung Carcinoma Survival Analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Hong S, Youn YN, Yi G, et al. Long Term Results of ST-Segment Ele- vation Myocardial Infarction versus Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myo- cardial Infarction after Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Pro- pensity Score Matching Analysis. J Korean Med Sci ,2012,27 (2) :153- 159.
  • 2Berger JS, Herout PM, Harshaw Q. Bleeding-associated outcomes with preoperative clopidogrel use in on-and off-pump coronary artery by- pass. Thromb Thrombolysis,2012,34 ( 1 ) :56-64.
  • 3Choi AH, Barnholtz-Sloan JS, Kim JA. Effect of radiation therapy on survival in surgically resected retroperitoneal sarcoma: a propensity score-adjusted SEER analysis. Ann Onco1,2012,23 (9) :2449-2457.
  • 4Wisnivesky JP, Halm EA, Bonomi M, et al. Postoperative radiotherapy for elderly patients with stage III lung cancer. Cancer ,2012,118 ( 18 ) : 4478-4485.
  • 5Oh KH, Hwang YH, Cho JH, et al. Outcome of early initiation of perito- neal dialysis in patients with end-stage renal failure. J Korean Med Sci, 2012,27(2) :170-176.
  • 6王永吉,蔡宏伟,夏结来,蒋志伟.倾向指数第二讲倾向指数常用研究方法[J].中华流行病学杂志,2010,31(5):584-585. 被引量:48
  • 7王永吉,蔡宏伟,夏结来,蒋志伟.倾向指数:第一讲 倾向指数的基本概念和研究步骤[J].中华流行病学杂志,2010,31(3):347-348. 被引量:92
  • 8SAS 9.2 Macro Language Reference, SAS Institute Inc ,2008.
  • 9Art Carpenter. Carpenter's Complete Guide to the SAS Macro Language (2nd Edition) SAS Publishing ,2004.
  • 10Walsh P, Shanholtzer L, Loewen M, et al. A matched case control study with propensity score balancing examining the protective effect of paracetamol against parentally reported apnoea in infants. Resuscitation, 2010,83 (4) :440-446.

二级参考文献24

  • 1Austin PC.A critical appraisal of propensity-score matching in the medical literature between 1996 and 2003.Stat Med,2008,27:2037-2049.
  • 2Austin PC,Grootendorst P,Anderson GM.A comparison of the ability of different propensity score models to balance measured variables between treated and untreated subjects:a Monte Carlo study.Stat Med,2007,26:734-753.
  • 3Rosenbaum PR,Rubin DB.The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects.Biometrika,1983,70:41-55.
  • 4Katherine HH,Thomas AL.Propensity score modeling strategies for the causal analysis of observational data.Biostatistics,2002,2:179-193.
  • 5Austin PC,Mamdanil MM.A comparison of propensity score methods:a case-study estimating the effectiveness of post-AMI statin use.Stat Med,2006,25:2084-2106.
  • 6Ekundayo OJ,Adamopoulos C,Ahmed MI,et al.Oral potassium supplement use and outcomes in chronic heart failure:a propensity-matched study.Int J Cardiol,2009.
  • 7D'Agostino RB.Propensity score methods for bias reduction in the comparison of a treatment to a non-randomized control group.Stat Med,1998,17:2265-2281.
  • 8Brookhart MA,Schneeweiss S,Rothman KJ,et al.Variable selection for propensity score models.Prac Epidemiol,2006,163:1149-1156.
  • 9Perkins SM,Tu W,Underhill MG,et al.The use of propensity scores in pharmacoepidemioiogic research.Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Safety,2000,9:93-101.
  • 10Sturmer T,Joshi M,Glynn RJ,et al.A review of the application of propensity score methods yielded increasing use,advantages in specific settings,but not substantially different estimates compared with conventional multivariable methods.J Clin Epidemiol,2006,59:437-447.

共引文献107

同被引文献72

引证文献9

二级引证文献26

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部