期刊文献+

基于感知价值的城市森林游憩者满意度研究——以南京紫金山国家森林公园为例 被引量:25

Study on Urban Forest Recreationists' Satisfaction Based on Perceived Value: A Case in Purple Mountain National Forest Park, Nanjing
下载PDF
导出
摘要 通过探索性因子分析和结构方程模型方法,构建了城市森林游憩者满意度模型,并进行了实证研究。研究发现:(1)"景观资源感知""设施服务感知""功能效用感知""社会效用感知"和"情感效用感知"是影响游憩者感知价值的重要因素;(2)感知价值对游憩者满意体验的形成具有重要而积极的影响;(3)"情感效用感知"和"景观资源感知"是影响游憩者满意度的关键因素,"功能效用感知"和"社会效用感知"对游憩者感知价值有积极影响,而"设施服务感知"可能是游憩者满意度评价的保障性因素;(4)"途径—目的"理论和"认知—情感"理论在城市森林游憩者满意度研究中也具有一定的适用性。 Utilizing the method of exploratory factor analysis and structural equation modeling, this paper built an model of urban forest recreationists' satisfaction and conducted an empirical research. The results are shown as follows: l) "Landscape resource perception", "facilities and services perception", "functional effect perception", "social effect perception" and "emotional effect perception" are important factors influencing the recreationists' perceived value; 2) The perceived value has significant and positive influence to form the satisfactory experience of recreationists; 3) "Emotional effect perception" and "landscape resource perception" are the key factors in influencing recreationists' satisfaction. "Functional effect perception" and "social effect perception" have positive effects on recreationists' perceived value, while "facilities and services perception" is believed as an affordable factor; 4) "Means-end" theory and "cognitive-affective" theory have certain applicability in the research of urban forest recreationists' satisfaction.
出处 《生态经济》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第5期146-152,共7页 Ecological Economy
基金 教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目"城市旅游地景观时空演变机制及优化的比较研究--以长三角区域为例"(13YJC790010) 江苏省教育厅高校哲学社会科学研究基金项目"休闲城市导向的游憩空间发展研究--以南京为例"(2013SJD790042) 江苏省社科研究青年精品课题"生态文明视野下江苏城市森林游憩资源开发研究"(13SQC-120)
关键词 感知价值 游憩者满意度 城市森林 结构方程模型 perceived value recreationists' satisfaction urban forest structural equation model
  • 相关文献

参考文献53

  • 1Dwyer J F, Schroeder H W, Gobster P H. The significance of urban trees and forests: towards a deeper understanding of values[J]. Journal of Arboriculture, 1991,17(10): 276-284.
  • 2H6rnsten L, Fredman P. On the distance to recreational forests in Sweden [J]. Landscape and urban planning, 2000, 51(1): 1-10.
  • 3Konijnendijk C C. Adapting forestry to urban demands - role of communication in urban forestry in Europe [J]. Landscape and urban planning, 2000, 52(2): 89-100.
  • 4Arnberger A. Recreation use of urban forests: An inter-area comparison[J]. Urban Foreslry & Urban Greening, 2006, 4(3): 135-144.
  • 5Abildtrup J, Garcia S, Olsen S B, et al. Spatial preference heterogeneity in forest recreation [J]. Ecological Economics, 2013, 92: 1-136.
  • 6Rantala O. Tourist practices in the forest [J]. Annals of Tourism Research, 2010, 37(1): 249-264.
  • 7Christie M, Hanley N, Hynes S. Valuing enhancements to forestrecreation using choice experiment and contingent behaviour methods [J]. Journal of Forest Economics, 2007, 13(2): 75-102.
  • 8Mann C, Pouta E, Gentin S, et al. Outdoor recreation in forest policy and legislation: A European comparison [J]. Urban forestry & urban greening, 2010, 9(4): 303-312.
  • 9Wilson E O. Biophilia: The human bond with other species [M]. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1984.
  • 10Jim C Y, Chen W Y. Ecosystem services and valuation of urban forests in China[J]. Cities, 2009, 26(4): 187-194.

二级参考文献350

共引文献929

同被引文献498

引证文献25

二级引证文献136

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部