期刊文献+

保留十二指肠胰头切除术治疗胰头部肿块型慢性胰腺炎的疗效 被引量:2

Efficacy of duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection for chronic pancreatitis with mass in the head of the pancreas
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨保留十二指肠的胰头切除术主要术式Beger术与Berne术治疗胰头部肿块型慢性胰腺炎的疗效。方法回顾性分析2008年9月至2012年4月贵阳医学院附属医院收治的46例胰头部肿块型慢性胰腺炎患者的临床资料。其中24例行Beger术(Beger组),22例行Berne术(Berne组)。评估患者术后并发症、生命质量、疼痛程度。采用电话和门诊随访,随访时间截至2013年4月。计量资料采用Mann.WhitneyU检验;率或构成比的比较采用矿检验或连续校正矿检验。结果Beger组患者手术时间和术中出血量分别为(377±21)min和(746±129)mL,Berne组分别为(323±17)min和(577±111)mL,两组比较,差异有统计学意义(U=14.0,88.0,P〈0.05)。Beger组患者术后发生胰液漏4例,Berne组术后发生胰液漏1例,两组比较,差异无统计学意义(x2=0.714,P〉0.05)。生命质量功能评估(身体状况、工作能力、认知力、情绪、社会、总体生命质量):Beger组患者分别为(82±14)分、(74±24)分、(90±18)分、(78±20)分、(83±18)分、(73±18)分;Berne组分别为(79±16)分、(71±20)分、(92±21)分、(76±18)分、(80±21)分、(70±16)分,两组比较,差异均无统计学意义(U=177.5,183.5,187.5,178.0,189.5,192.0,P〉0.05)。生命质量症状评估(疲劳、恶心及呕吐、疼痛、食欲不振、呼吸困难、睡眠障碍、便秘、腹泻、财务焦虑):Beger组患者分别为(28±16)分、(24±10)分、(20±12)分、(23±14)分、(4±1)分、(32±12)分、(6±2)分、(18±14)分、(36±18)分;Berne组分别为(26±18)分、(26±20)分、(22±16)分、(26±16)分、(3±1)分、(30±10)分、(5±1)分、(16±12)分、(38±20)分,两组比较,差异均无统计学意义(U=194.5,215.5,182.5,180.5,213.0,199.0,195.0,184.5,181.5,P〉0.05)。疼痛程度评估:Beger组患者中,19例无急性发作,5例发生频率1次/年,18例没有使用止痛药,6例偶尔使用;Berne组患者中,20例无发作,2例发生频率1次/年,18例没有使用止痛药,4例偶尔使用,两组患者在疼痛急性发作和使用止痛药方面比较,差异无统计学意义(x2=0.485,0.041,P〉0.05)。46例患者均获随访,平均随访时间为36.3个月。患者生存良好,均无十二指肠穿孔、脂肪泻等并发症发生,无死亡病例。结论Berne术治疗胰头部肿块型慢性胰腺炎的疗效与Beger术相当,但Berne术操作简单,能明显缩短手术时间,便于临床推广应用。 Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy of two types of duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection (Beger procedure and Berne procedure) for chronic pancreatitis with mass in the head of the pancreas. Methods The clinical data of 46 patients with chronic pancreatitis and mass in the head of the pancreas who were admitted to the Affiliated Hospital of Guiyang Medical College from September 2008 to April 2012 were retrospectively analyzed. There were 24 patients received Beger procedure ( Beger group), and 22 received Berne procedure (Berne group). The complications, life quality and pain after the operation were evaluated. Patients were followed up via phone call and out-patient examination till April 2013. The measurement data were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U test, and the constituent ratios were compared using the chi-square test. Results The operation time and volume of blood loss were (377 ± 21 )minutes and (746 ± 129)mL in the Beger group, and ( 323 ± 17 ) minutes and (577 ± 111 ) mL in the Berne group, with significant difference between the 2 groups ( U = 14. 0, 88.0, P 〈 0.05). Four patients in the Beger group and 1 in the Berne group were complicated with pancreaticleakage, with no significant difference between the 2 groups (X2= 0. 714, P 〉 0.05 ). The scores of life quality evaluation (physical condition, work capacity, cognitive ability, emotion, social competence and overall life quality) were 82 ± 14, 74 ±24, 90 ± 18, 78 ±20, 83 ± 18, 73 ± 18 in the Beger group, and 79 ± 16, 71 ±20, 92 -±21, 76 ± 18, 80 ± 21,70 ± 16 in the Berne group, with no significant difference between the 2 groups ( U = 177.5, 183.5, 187. 5, 178. 0, 189. 5, 192. 0, P 〉 0.05). The scores of symptom evaluation (fatigue, nausea and vomitting, pain, anorexia, dyspnea, sleep disorders, obstipation, diarrhea, financial worries) were 28 ± 16, 24 ± 10, 20 ± 12, 23 ± 14, 4 ± 1, 32 ± 12, 6 -±2, 18 ± 14, 36 ± 18 in the Beger group, and 26 ± 18, 26 ±20, 22 ± 16, 26 ± 16, 3 ± 1, 30 ± 10, 5 ± 1, 16 ± 12, 38 ± 20 in the Berne group, with no significant difference between the2groups (U=194.5, 215.5, 182. 5, 180. 5, 213.0, 199.0, 195.0, 184. 5, 181.5, P〉0.05). In the Beger group, 19 patients did not have acute onset of pain, and 5 patients had acute onset of pain once a year; 6 patients were administered antalgesic occasionally. In the Berne group, 20 patients did not have acute onset of pain, and 2 patients had acute onset of pain once a year; 4 patients were administered antalgesic occasionally, with no significant difference between the 2 groups (X2 = 0. 485, 0. 041, P 〉 0.05 ). All the patients were followed up, and the median time of follow-up was 36.3 months. No perforation of duodenum and steatorrhea was observed. No patient died perioperatively. Conclusion The clinical efficacy of the Berne procedure is similar to that of the Beger procedure, while the Berne procedure has advantages of easy manipulation and less operation time.
出处 《中华消化外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2014年第4期255-258,共4页 Chinese Journal of Digestive Surgery
关键词 慢性胰腺炎 胰头部肿块型 Beger术 Berne术 Chronic pancreatitis Mass in the head of the pancreas Beger procedure Berne procedure
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Falconi M, Bassi C, Casetti L, et al. Long-term results of Frey's procedure for chronic pancreatitis: a longitudinal prospective study on 40 patientsj]].J Gastrointest Surg,2006,1O(4) :504-510.
  • 2Liao Z,Jin G, Cai D, et al. Guidelines: diagnosis and therapy for chronic pancreatitis[J].J Interv Gastroenterol ,2013 ,3 ( 4 ) : 133-136.
  • 3Bachmann K, Tomkoetter L, Kutup A, et al. Is the Whipple procedure harmful for long-term outcome in treatment of chronic pancreatitis? 15-years follow-up comparing the outcome after pyloruspreserving pancreatoduodenectomy and Frey procedure in chronic pancreatitis[J]. Ann Surg,2013,258(5) :815-821.
  • 4Beger HG, Krautzberger W, Bittner R, et al. Duodenum-preserving resection of the head of the pancreas in patients with severe chronic pancreatitis[J]. Surgery, 1985,97 (4) :467 -473.
  • 5Gloor B, Friess H, Uhl W, et al. A modified technique of the Beger and Frey procedure in patients with chronic pancreatitis[J] . Dig Surg,2001 ,18(1) :21-25.
  • 6Howard TJ, Stonerock CE, SarkarJ, et al. Contemporary treatment strategies for external pancreatic fistulas[J]. Surgery, 1998 , 124 (4) :627 -632.
  • 7Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B, et al. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncologyJ J]:J Nat! Cancer Inst,1993,85(5) :365-376.
  • 8Mobius C, Max D, Uhlmann D, et al. Five-year follow-up of a prospective non-randomised study comparing duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection with classic Whipple procedure in the treatment of chronic pancreatitis[J]. Langenbecks Arch Surg, 2007,392 (3) :359-364.
  • 9刘续宝,谭春路.慢性胰腺炎的外科治疗策略[J].中华消化外科杂志,2012,11(4):318-319. 被引量:8
  • 10王双佳,李秀东,苏旭,李志民,许东辉,周彦明,陈景熙,李滨.区域性胰腺切除治疗胰腺良性肿瘤[J].中华消化外科杂志,2013,12(8):602-604. 被引量:5

二级参考文献11

  • 1刘续宝,张肇达,严律南,田伯乐,胡伟明,李全生,李军杰.慢性胰腺炎的病理类型和手术术式的选择[J].中华普通外科杂志,2005,20(11):681-683. 被引量:17
  • 2Farkas G, Leindler L, Daroczi M, et al. Organ-preserving pancre- atic head resection in chronic pancreatitis. Br J Surg, 2003,90 (t) :29-32.
  • 3Strate T, Taherpour Z, Bloechle C, et al. Long-term follow-up of a randomized trial comparing the beger and frey procedures for patients suffering from chronic pancreatitis. Ann Surg,2005,241 (4) :591-598.
  • 4Zheng Z, Xiang G, Tan C, et al. Pancreaticoduodenectomy versus duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection for the treatment of chronic pancreatitis. Pancreas,2012,41 ( 1 ) : 147-152.
  • 5Sauvanet A, Partensky C, Sastre B, et al. Medial pancreatecto?my: a multi-institutional retrospective study of 53 patients by the French Pancreas Club. Surgery,2002,132(5) :836-843.
  • 6Xiang GM, Tan CL, Zhang H, et al. Central pancreatectomy for benign or borderline lesions of the pancreatic neck: a single cen?tral experience and literature review. Hepatogastroenterology ,2012, 59(116) :1286-1289.
  • 7Ferrone CR, Warshaw AL, Rattner OW, et al. Pancreatic fistula rates after 462 distal pancreatectomies: staplers do not decrease fistula rates.J Gastrointest Surg, 2008 , 12 ( 10) : 1691- 1698.
  • 8Venara A, de Franco V, Mucci S, et al. Central pancreatectomy: comparison of results according to the type of anastomosis.J Vise Surg,2012,149(2) :eI53-158.
  • 9赵玉沛.慢性胰腺炎诊治指南(讨论稿)[J].中国实用外科杂志,2009,29(1):1-4. 被引量:22
  • 10郭克建,孟凡斌.努力做好胰十二指肠切除术[J].中华消化外科杂志,2011,10(5):332-334. 被引量:10

共引文献11

同被引文献23

  • 1Jakob Lykke Poulsen,Sφren Schou Olesen,Lasse Paludan Malver,Jens Brφndum Frφkjr,Asbjφrn Mohr Drewes.Pain and chronic pancreatitis: A complex interplay of multiple mechanisms[J].World Journal of Gastroenterology,2013,19(42):7282-7291. 被引量:6
  • 2Sakorafas GH, Gobolas B. Lateral pancreatojejunostomy in the surgical management of chronic pancreatitis. Current concepts and future perspectives [ J ]. Dig Liver Dis ,2001,33 ( 2 ) : 187-191.
  • 3Ahmed Ali U, Issa Y, Bruno MJ, et al. Early surgery versus opti- mal current step-up practice for chronic pancreatitis (ESCAPE) : design and rationale of a randomized trial[ J]. BMC Gastroenterol, 2013,13:49.
  • 4Sauerbruch T, Holl J, Sackmann M, et al. Extracorporeal litho- tripsy of pancreatic stones in patients with chronic pancreatitis and pain : a prospective follow up study [ J ]. Gut, 1992,33 (7) : 969- 972.
  • 5Bassi C, Dervenis C, Bunurini G, et al. Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition [ J]. Surgery,2005,138 ( 1 ) : 8-13.
  • 6Murakami Y, Uemura K, Hayashidani Y, et al. No mortality after 150 consecutive pancreatoduodenctomies with duct-to-mucosa pan- creaticogastrostomy [ J ]. J Surg Onco1,2008,97 (3) :205-209.
  • 7Park YC, Kim SW, Jang JY, et al. Factors influencing delayed gastric emptying after pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy [J]. J Am Coil Surg,2003,196(6):859-865.
  • 8Btichler MW, Friess H, Mtiller MW, et al. Randomized trial of duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection versus pylorus-pre- serving Whipple in chronic pancreatitis[ J]. Am J Surg,1995,169 ( 1 ) :65-70.
  • 9Klempa I, Spatny M, Menzel J, et al. Pancreatic function and quality of life after resection of the head of the pancreas in chronic pancreatitis. A prospective, randomized comparative study after duodenum preserving resection of the head of the pancreas versus Whippleg operation[J]. Chirurg, 1995,66 (4) :350-359.
  • 10Farkas G, Leindler L, Dar6czi M, et al. Prospective randomised comparison of organ-preserving pancreatic head resection with pylo- ms-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy [ J]. Langenbecks Arch Surg,2006,391 (4) :338-342.

引证文献2

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部