期刊文献+

大跨小净距偏压隧道施工方案优化分析 被引量:15

Analysis of Construction Schemes Optimization for Large-span Bias Tunnels with Small Clear Distance
原文传递
导出
摘要 在大跨小净距偏压隧道施工中,合理的施工方法和施工工序对保证围岩稳定性和支护结构受力有很大影响。结合大跨小净距偏压隧道的结构形式,总结了其受力特点,并建立大跨小净距隧道在Ⅴ级围岩浅埋偏压环境下的有限元数值模型,分别采用双侧壁导坑法、CRD法对不同施工工序下围岩位移、应力和塑性区等进行对比分析。结果表明:CRD对控制隧道水平收敛较为有利,但隧道拱脚处应力集中现象明显,围岩塑性区较大,双侧壁导坑法对控制隧道拱顶下沉较为有利;先开挖浅埋侧隧道时中岩柱两侧拱肩、拱腰应力集中较大,而先开挖深埋侧隧道时隧道拱脚应力集中较大;先开挖隧道内侧时,洞周围岩位移较大。 For the construction of large-span bias tunnel with small clear distance, rational excavating methods and sequence have important impacts on stability of surrounding rock mass and supporting optimization. Based on the structure type of large-span bias tunnel with small spacing, its mechanic characteristics are summarized. At the same time, numerical simulation models under Grade V are established and the displacement, stress, the plastic zone of surrounding rock under CRD and double side excavation method are analyzed and compared. The results show that CRD excavation method is propitious to control level convergence while double side excavation method is propitious to control settlement of crown. Displacement of surrounding rock is much bigger if tunnel's lateral is excavated before tunnel's outside. The stress of abutment and haunch between the middle rock pillar concentrated more seriously if the shallow tunnel is excavated earlier than the deep one, or the stress of arch springing of the tunnel concentrated more seriously.
出处 《公路》 北大核心 2014年第4期225-230,共6页 Highway
基金 国家自然科学基金项目 项目编号41102220 51178398 教育部创新团队发展计划资助项目 项目编号IRT0955
关键词 大跨径 小净距 偏压隧道 施工方法 施工工序 优化 large-span with small clear distance bias tunnel excavating method excavatingsequence optimization
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献59

共引文献319

同被引文献131

引证文献15

二级引证文献56

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部