期刊文献+

浅谈网络舆论对侦查询问的影响

Network Public Opinion’s Influence on Inquiry in Investigating Cases
下载PDF
导出
摘要 刑事案件发生后,网络上充斥着大量有关该案的信息,侦查人员接触这些信息,会形成偏见,以至在侦查询问中提出带有暗示性和倾向性的问题;而记忆是可塑的,信息误导效应会利用记忆的可塑性在证人不自知的情况下,改变其记忆;网络舆论的倾向性,也会影响证人的情绪和立场,影响证人的作证动机。 After the criminal case occurs, a lot of information about the case will flood the internet. If the inves-tigators contact such information, they will tend to form some prejudice, and puts forward suggestive and tenden-tious questions in inquiry in investigating the case. However, memory is plastic, which makes people misled un-consciously and finally change the memory. Meanwhile, the network public opinion also has some tendency, and will affect the witness 'mood and position.
出处 《安徽警官职业学院学报》 2014年第2期91-93,共3页 Journal of Anhui Vocational College of Police Officers
基金 中国人民公安大学研究生科研创新项目《信息化社会背景下打击犯罪对策研究》(项目编号:2013SKX08)的阶段性研究成果.
关键词 网络舆论 侦查询问 偏见 信息误导效应 作证动机 network public opinion inquiry in investigating cases prejudice effects of misleading information motive to testify
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1赵桂芬.讯问中的非言语行为[J].中国人民公安大学学报(社会科学版),2003,19(3):106-113. 被引量:22
  • 2[英]peterB.Ainsworth.犯罪人特征剖析[M].赵桂芬,译.北京:中国轻工业出版社,2007:69—76.
  • 3李安,房旭兴.侦查心理学——侦查心理的理论与实践[M].北京:中国法制出版社,2007:112-113.
  • 4罗大华.暗示对证人影响之研究[J].中国政法大学学报,1988(5):46-53.
  • 5[美]伊丽莎白·洛夫特斯,凯瑟琳·克禅.当心!你的记忆会犯罪[M].王兮,译.太原:山西人民出版社,2010:54-55.

二级参考文献30

  • 1[1]Akeherst. L.and Vrij, A. (1999) .Creating suspects in police interviews. Journal of Applied Social Psychology,29, 192-210.
  • 2[2]Bond, C.F.Jr., Kahler, K.N.and Paolicelli, L.M.(1985) . The miscommunication of deception: An adaptive perspective. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 21, 331-345.
  • 3[3]Bugental, D.B., Henker, B and Whalen, C.K.(1976) .Attibutional antecedents of verbal and vocal assertiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,34, 405-411.
  • 4[4]Bull, Ray (2002) .Applying psychology of crime investigation: the case of police interviewing. Mckenzie, Ian K. and Bull Ray ( ed. ), Criminal Justice Research: Inspiration, influence and ideation. Aldershot, Hampshire:Dartmouth Publishing Company. 221-243.
  • 5[5]Cody, M.J., Marston, P.J.and Foster, M. (1984) .Deception: Paralinguistic and verbal leakage, In R.N.Bostron ( ed. ), Communication Yearbook 8. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • 6[6]DePaulo, B.M.andKirkendol, S.E. (1988) .The motivational impairment effect in the communication of deception, In J.Yuille (ed.), Credibility Assessment. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic.
  • 7[7]DePaulo, B.M., Lanier, K.and Davis, T. (1983) .Detecting the deceit of the motivated liar. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 16, 249-267.
  • 8[8]DePaulo, B.M., Lassiter, G.D.and Stone, J.A.(1982) . Attentional determinants of success at detecting deception or truth. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 8, 273-279.
  • 9[9]DePaulo, B.M., Stone, J.A.and Lassiter, G.D.(1985a), Deceiving and detecting deceit. In B.R.Schlenker (ed.), The Self and Social Life. New York:McGraw- Hill.
  • 10[10]DePaulo, B.M., Kirkendol, S.E., Tang, J.and O'Brien, T. (1988) . The motivational impairment effect in the communication of deception: Replications and extensions. Journal of Non Verbal Behavior, 12, 177-202.

共引文献22

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部