期刊文献+

李长之与沈从文文学批评观之比较 被引量:2

Comparison of Li Changzhi's and Shen Congwen's View of Literature Criticism
下载PDF
导出
摘要 李长之与沈从文同是"京派"文学批评的大家,但其批评观亦有各自的独特性。将两者的文学批评放置在"京派"批评的范式内做比较,可以彰显其批评个性。"京派"本是个倡导学术自由、宽容的松散学术团体,这种"和而不同"式的学术存在方式正是"京派"自身生命力之所在;同时,众多"京派"批评家的批评实践也丰富了中国现代文学批评的百花园。 Both Li Changzhi and Shen Congwen belong to the great masters of the critics of Beijing their criticism viewpoints have their own uniqueness. Through comparing their literary criticism paradi school, but gm, we can reveal their criticism personality. "Beijing school" was a loose group of scholars, which advocates the academic freedom and tolerance, and it is the "harmony and but different" type of academic existence that expresses the vitality of the "Beijing school". At the same time, enriched the modem Chinese literary criticism. many critics' criticism of the "Beijing school" has also
作者 薛磊
出处 《安徽警官职业学院学报》 2014年第2期122-124,共3页 Journal of Anhui Vocational College of Police Officers
关键词 李长之 沈从文 文学批评 Li Changzhi Shen Congwen literature criticism
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献2

  • 1郜元宝,李书编,李长之.李长之批评文集[M]珠海出版社,1998.
  • 2[美]朗格(Langer,S·K·) 著,刘大基等 译.情感与形式[M]. 中国社会科学出版社, 1986

共引文献4

同被引文献2

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部