摘要
李长之与沈从文同是"京派"文学批评的大家,但其批评观亦有各自的独特性。将两者的文学批评放置在"京派"批评的范式内做比较,可以彰显其批评个性。"京派"本是个倡导学术自由、宽容的松散学术团体,这种"和而不同"式的学术存在方式正是"京派"自身生命力之所在;同时,众多"京派"批评家的批评实践也丰富了中国现代文学批评的百花园。
Both Li Changzhi and Shen Congwen belong to the great masters of the critics of Beijing their criticism viewpoints have their own uniqueness. Through comparing their literary criticism paradi school, but gm, we can reveal their criticism personality. "Beijing school" was a loose group of scholars, which advocates the academic freedom and tolerance, and it is the "harmony and but different" type of academic existence that expresses the vitality of the "Beijing school". At the same time, enriched the modem Chinese literary criticism. many critics' criticism of the "Beijing school" has also
出处
《安徽警官职业学院学报》
2014年第2期122-124,共3页
Journal of Anhui Vocational College of Police Officers
关键词
李长之
沈从文
文学批评
Li Changzhi
Shen Congwen
literature criticism