期刊文献+

言访工作人员心理和谐与一般自我效能感的相关研究

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的研究信访工作人员心理和谐与一般自我效能感的关系,并探讨心理和谐对一般自我效能感的影响。方法采用心理和谐量表和一般自我效能感量表对某市108名信访工作人员进行问卷调查。结果①男女信访工作人员在心理和谐上的得分无显著差异(t=1.396。p〉0.166),但在一般自我效能感上的得分有显著差异(t=2.511,p〈0.05);②不同年龄的信访工作人员在心理和谐及一般效能感上的得分有显著差异(F=23.130,p〈0.05,F=14.676,p〈0.05);③信访工作人员心理和谐总分与一般自我效能感呈显著正相关(r=0.288,p〈0.05)。结论中间年龄阶段的信访工作人员心理和谐状况好于其他年龄阶段的,但26.30岁这一年龄阶段工作人员的自我效能感高于30岁以上的员工,女性自我效能感高于男性;心理和谐状况好的工作人员一般自我效能感也高。 Objective To study the relationship between the petition staff's psychological harmony and general self-efficacy, and explore the impacts of psychological harmony on their general self-efficacy. Methods To adopt psychological harmony scale and general self-efficacy scale to investigate 108 petition staff in one city. Re- sults (1)The petition staff's psychological harmony has no significant differences in gender (t=1. 396, p〉0. 166), but Their general self-efficacy has significant differ- ences in gender (t=-2.511, p〈0. 05); (2)The petition staff's psychological harmony and general self-efficacy have sig- nificant differences in age(F=23.130, p〈0. 05, F=14.676, p〈0. 05);(3)The petition staff's psychological harmony and gen- eral self-efficacy have significant correlation (r=0.288, p〈0. 05).Conclusions The middle age stage of the petition staff's psychological harmony is better than that of the other age stage, but 26 to 30 years old of their general self-efficacy is higher than that of over the age of 30, and the female of general self-efficacy is higher than that of men ; the psychological harmony can predict the petition staff's general self-efficacy.
出处 《商情》 2014年第13期110-111,共2页
基金 本文为2013年河北省社会科学基金项目《心理和谐视角下基层信访的解决困境及其对策研究》的成果之一.课题编号:HB13SH007
关键词 信访工作人员 心理和谐 一般自我效能感 The petition staff,Psychological harmony,Gen-eral self-efficacy
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献26

  • 1李经伟.西方语言与性别研究述评[J].解放军外国语学院学报,2001,24(1):11-15. 被引量:77
  • 2Zimmerman B J. Self efficacy: an essential motive to learn. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 2000,25: 82 - 91.
  • 3Bandura A. Self efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 1977,84: 191 - 215.
  • 4Bandura A. Self efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman, 1977.
  • 5Schwarzer R, Aristi B. Optimistic self beliefs: Assessment of general perceived self efficacy in thirteen cultures. Word Psychology: 1997,3( 1 - 2): 177 - 190. Psychologia,40:1 - 13.
  • 6Schwarzer R, et al. The assessment of optimistic self beliefs: Comparison of the Chinese, Indonesian, Japanese, and Korean versions of the General Self - Efficacy Scale.Psychologia, 1997,40: 1 - 13.
  • 7Schwarzer R, Mueller J, Greenglass E (1999). Assessment of general perceived self efficacy on the internet:data collection in cyberspace. Anxiety, Stress, and Copying,12(3):145-161.
  • 8Hambleton R K, Swaminathan H. Item response theory: principles and applications,1985,157,or 16 - 22.
  • 9Cameron,D. The Feminist Critique of Language:A Reader[M].New York:Routledge,1990.
  • 10Cameron,D. Rethinking language and gender studies:Some issues for the 1990s[A].New York:Longman,1995.31-44.

共引文献2705

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部