期刊文献+

基于交错取样门限多幂次变差的中国股市波动细分及非对称性建模 被引量:2

Chinese Stock Markets' Volatility Distinction and Asymmetric Modeling Using Staggered Threshold Multi-power Variation
原文传递
导出
摘要 以多幂次变差的测量为理论基础,考虑到有限样本规模的局限以及市场微观结构噪声的影响,提出交错取样门限多幂次变差方法并将其用于中国股市高频已实现波动的细分,区分出连续波动与跳跃波动。根据已实现波动、连续波动与跳跃波动的不同统计特征,分别为已实现波动与连续波动建立LHAR-V-CJ模型,为跳跃波动强度建立LHAR-SJ-C模型,为跳跃波动间隔时间建立LACH-DJ-C模型,引入异质非对称性。使用沪深300指数的实证表明,已实现波动及连续波动与跳跃强度、跳跃间隔时间呈现出不同的非对称性特征,且本文提出的各非对称性模型较现有模型均有较明显的拟合能力改进。 Based on the theory of multi-power variation measures and considering the limitation of finite sample size as well as market microstructure noises, we propose a staggered threshold multi-power variation, which is then used in Chinese stock markets' realized volatility distinction, generating continuous-time volatility and jump volatility estimators. According to different statistical characteristics of realized volatility, continuous-time volatility and jump volatility, we set up LHAR-V-CJ model for realized volatility and continuous-time volatility, LHAR-SJ-C model for jump sizes, LACH-DJ-C model for jump intervals, all of which introduce characterization of heterogeneous asymmetry. Empirical results using CSI300 index indicate that, realized volatility and continuous-time volatility, jump sizes, jump intervals show different asymmetric effects. In addition, our proposed asymmetric models all lead to significant fitting capability improvements.
作者 瞿慧
出处 《系统工程》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2014年第2期32-39,共8页 Systems Engineering
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(71201075) 江苏省自然科学基金资助项目(BK2011561) 高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金资助项目(20120091120003) 中央高校基本科研业务费专项(1107011810 1118011804) 教育部留学回国人员科研启动基金资助项目
关键词 交错取样门限多幂次变差 已实现波动 连续波动 跳跃波动 跳跃强度 跳跃间隔时间 非对称性建模 Staggered Threshold Multi-power Variation Realized Volatility Continuous-time Volatility Jump Volatility Jump Size Jump Interval Asymmetric Models
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

  • 1Andersen T, Bollerslev T. Answering the skeptics: Yes, standard volatility models do provide accurate forecasts[J]. International Economic Review, 1998, 39(4): 885905.
  • 2Andersen T, Bollerslev T, Diebold F, Ebens H. The distribution of realized stock return volatility[J].Journal of Financial Economics, 2001, 61 (1): 43 76.
  • 3Barndorff-Nielsen 0, Shephard N. Estimating quadratic variation using realized variance[J].Journal of Applied Econometrics, 2002,17(5): 457 477.
  • 4Barndorff-Nielsen ° .Shephard N. Power and bipower variation with stochastic volatility andJumps[J].Journal of Financial Econometrics, 2004, 2 (1) : 1 37.
  • 5Barndorff-Nielsen 0, Shephard N. Econometrics of testing forJumps in financial economics using bipower variation[J]'Journal of Financial Econometrics, 2006 ,4 (1) : 1 30.
  • 6Barndorff-Nielsen 0, Shephard N, Winkel M. Limit theorems for multi power variation in the presence ofJumps[J]. Stochastic Processes and Their Appli?cations, 2006,116 (5) : 796 806.
  • 7Huang X, Tauchen G. The relative contribution ofJumps to total price variance[J].Journal of Financial Econometrics, 2005,3(4): 456499.
  • 8Andersen T, Bollerslev T, Diebold, F. Roughing it up: IncludingJump components in the measurement, modeling, and forecasting of return volatility[J]. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 2007, 89 (4):701720.
  • 9Corsi F, Pirino D, Reno R. Threshold bipower variation and the impact ofJumps on volatility forecastingJ J],Journal of Econometrics, 2010, 159 (2): 276 288.
  • 10Corsi F. A simple long memory model of realized volatility[ZJ. Lugano , University of Lugano , 2004.

二级参考文献98

共引文献98

同被引文献35

  • 1Andersen T G,Bollerslev T. Answering the skeptics: Yes, standard volatility models do provide accurate forecasts[J]. International Economic Review, 1998, 39 (4) : 885- 905.
  • 2Andersen T G, et al. The distribution of realized stock return volatility l-J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2001,61 (1) : 43- 76.
  • 3Andersen T G, et al. The distribution of realized exchange rate volatility[J]. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 2001,96 (453) : 42- 55.
  • 4Barndorff-Nielsen O E, Shephard N. Estimating quadratic variation using realized variance f-J]. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 2002,17 (5) : 457 477.
  • 5Barndorff-Nielsen O E, Shephard N. Power and bipower variation with stochastic volatility and jumps [J]. Journal of Financial Econometrics, 2004,2 (1) : 1-37.
  • 6Barndorff-Nielsen O E, Shephard N. Econometrics of testing for jumps in financial economics using bipower variation [J]. Journal of Financial Econometrics, 2006,4(1) : 1-30.
  • 7Huang X, Tauchen G. The relative contribution of jumps to total price variance[J]. Journal of Financial Econometrics, 2005,3 (4) : 456- 499.
  • 8Corsi F. A simple long memory model of realized volatility[Z]. Lugano:University of Lugano, 2004.
  • 9Corsi F. A simple approximate long-memory model of realized volatility [J]. Journal of Financial Econometrics, 2009,7 (2) : 174 - 196.
  • 10Miiller U A, et al. Volatilities of different time resolutions-analyzing the dynamics of market components [J]. Journal of Empirical Finance, 1997,4(2) :213-239.

引证文献2

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部