期刊文献+

上呼吸道感染后伴嗅觉功能障碍者嗅觉相关脑皮层的MRI体积测量 被引量:3

MRI volumetric analysis of olfaction-related cortex in olfactory dysfunction patients after upper respiratory tract infections
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 利用MRI测量上呼吸道感染后伴嗅觉功能障碍患者嗅觉相关脑皮层体积,并对脑皮层体积差异进行分析.方法 搜集上呼吸道感染后伴嗅觉功能障碍患者(患者组)及性别、年龄相匹配健康成人(对照组)各15例进行全脑三维结构MR扫描,采用Dr.View软件测量双侧大脑半球嗅觉相关皮层结构并计算体积,包括内嗅皮层(EC)、嗅周皮层(PRC)及岛叶皮层(IC)体积.采用Sniffin' Sticks法按照侧别对患者组与对照组进行嗅觉功能评价,包括嗅觉阈值(THR)、气味辨别(DIS)和气味识别(ID),将3种测试结果之和作为嗅觉功能评分(TDI).患者组与对照组EC、PRC、IC体积的差异以年龄及全脑颅内容积作为协变量采用单因素协方差分析,THR、DIS、ID、TDI嗅觉功能差异以年龄作为协变量采用单因素协方差分析.结果 (1)患者组左、右侧EC体积分别为(1.5±0.3)、(1.6±0.1)cm3,对照组分别为(1.7±0.2)、(1.8 ±0.3)cm3;患者组左、右侧PRC体积分别为(1.9±0.4)、(1.9±0.3)cm3,对照组分别为(2.5±0.8)、(2.3±0.7)cm3;患者组左、右侧IC体积分别为(5.2±0.4)、(5.8 ±0.5)cm3,对照组分别为(5.8±0.8)、(6.7±0.2)cm3;与对照组进行比较,患者组EC、PRC、IC体积均减小,差异具有统计学意义(F值分别为4.913、4.793、7.832、5.574、9.842、7.221,P值均<0.05).(2)患者组与对照组嗅觉功能评分比较,患者组THR、DIS、ID及TDI功能均降低,差异具有统计学意义(F值分别为54.508、118.774、93.039、53.692、74.139、53.626、91.842、91.696,P值均<0.01).结论 MRI可对嗅觉相关脑皮层进行体积测定,上呼吸道感染后伴嗅觉功能障碍患者EC、PRC及IC体积较正常人减小. Objective To measure the volume of olfaction-related cortex in olfactory dysfunction patients after upper respiratory tract infections via MRI,and to analyze the differences in the volume of olfaction-related cortex.Methods Fifteen olfactory dysfunction patients after upper respiratory tract infections (patient group) and fifteen age-and gender-matched normal volunteers (control group) were enrolled in this study to undergo 1.5 Tesla MR scanning.The volumes of olfaction-related cortex,including entorhinal cortex (EC),perirhinal cortex (PRC) and insular cortex (IC),were drawn and computed with Dr.View software.Olfactory function test was performed with the "Sniffin' Sticks" method which consisted of three tests:odor threshold (THR),odor discrimination (DIS),odor identification (ID),and their sum score (TDI).Statistical differences in the volumetric measures of bilateral EC,PRC,and IC between patient and control group were analyzed by analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with age and intracranial volume (ICV) as covariates.Statistical differences in the olfactory function between patient and control group were analyzed by ANCOVA with age as a covariate.Results (1) The EC volume of patient group in the left and right side were (1.5 ± 0.3),(1.6 ± 0.1) cm3,while the control group were (1.7 ± 0.2),(1.8 ± 0.3) cm3 ; The PRC volume of patient group in the left and right side were (1.9 ± 0.4),(1.9 ± 0.3) cm3,and the control group were (2.5 ± 0.8),(2.3 ± 0.7) cm3 ; The IC volume of patient group in the left and right side were (5.2 ± 0.4),(5.8 ± 0.5) cm3,and the control group were (5.8 ± 0.8),(6.7 ± 0.2) cm3.EC,PRC and IC volumes of patient group and control group were measured and the results showed that the olfaction-related cortex volume was decreased in patient group showing significant statistical difference (F =4.913,4.793,7.832,5.574,9.842,7.221,P < 0.05).(2) Olfactory function test of patient group and control group was performed and the results showed that the scores of patient group were lower than that of control group,and the differences were significant (F =54.508,118.774,93.039,53.692,74.139,53.626,91.842,91.696,P < 0.01).Conclusions It is feasible to measure the volumes of olfaction-related cortex with MRI,and the volumes of EC,PRC and IC decreased in olfactory dysfunction patients after upper respiratory tract infections compared with normal people.
出处 《中华放射学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2014年第4期270-274,共5页 Chinese Journal of Radiology
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(30470515)
关键词 嗅觉障碍 呼吸道感染 内嗅皮层 磁共振成像 Olfaction disorders Respiratory trace infections Entorhinal cortex Magnetic resonance imaging
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Nordin S, Bramerson A. Complaints of olfactory disorders : epidemiology, assessment and clinical implications [ J]. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immuno1,2008,8 : 10-15.
  • 2Mueller A, Rodewald A, Reden J, et al. Reduced olfactory bulb volume in post-traumatic and post-infectious olfactory dysfunction [ J]. Neuroreport ,2005,16:475-478.
  • 3Rombaux P, Weitz H, Mouraux A, et al. Olfactory function assessed with orthonasal and retronasal testing, olfactory bulb volume, and chemosensory event-related potentials [ J ]. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg,2006,132:1346-1351.
  • 4Rombaux P, Mouraux A, Bertrand B, et al. Olfactory function and olfactory bulb volume in patients with postinfectious olfactory loss [ J]. Laryngoscope ,2006,116:436-439.
  • 5Rombaux P, Martinage S, Huart C, et al. Post-infectious olfactory loss: a cohort study and update[ J]. B-ENT,2009,5 (Suppl 13 ) : 89-95.
  • 6Hummel T, Sekinger B, Wolf SR, et al. "Sniffin ' sticks" : olfactory performance assessed by the combined testing of odor identification, odor discrimination and olfactory threshold [J]. Chem Senses, 1997,22:39-52.
  • 7Kobal G, Klimek L, Wolfensberger M, et al. Multicenter investigation of 1,036 subjects using a standardized method for the assessment of olfactory function combining tests of odor identification, odor discrimination, and olfactory thresholds [ J]. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngo1,2000 ,257 :205-211.
  • 8Hummel T, Kobal G, Gudziol H, et al. Normative data for the "Sniffin' Sticks" including tests of odor identification, odor discrimination, and olfactory thresholds: an upgrade based on a group of more than 3, 000 subjects [ J ]. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 2007,264 : 237 -243.
  • 9Insausti R, Juottonen K, Soininen H, et al. MR volumetric analysis of the human entorhinal, perirhinal, and temporopolar cortices [ J]. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 1998,19:659-671.
  • 10Takahashi T, Suzuki M, Zhou SY, et al. Volumetric MRI study of the short and long insular cortices in schizophrenia spectrum disorders[ J ]. Psychiatry Res,2005 ,138 :209-220.

同被引文献22

  • 1Toledano A, Rodriguez G, Martn AM, et al. Quality of life in patients with smell loss due to upper respiratory tract infections [J]. Am J Otolaryngol, 2011, 32(6) : 504-510.
  • 2Rombaux P, Collet S, Martinage S, et al. Olfactory testing in clinical practice[J]. B-ENT, 2009, 5 Suppl 13: 39-51.
  • 3Nguyen AD, Pelavin PE, Shenton ME, et al. Olfactory sulcal depth and olfactory bulb volume in patients with schizophrenia: an MRI study[J]. Brain Imaging Behav, 2011, 50(4) : 252-261.
  • 4Murthy VN. Olfactory maps in the brain[ J]. Annu Rev Neurosci, 2011, 34: 233-258.
  • 5Reden J, Herring B, Lill K, et al. Treatment of postinfectious olfactory disorders with minocyeline: a double-blind, placebo- controlled study[ J]. Laryngoscope, 2011, 121 (3) : 679-682.
  • 6Germano J, Van Zerr VE, Esque TC, et al. Impacts of upper respiratory tract disease on olfactory behavior of the Mojave desert tortoise [J]. J Wildl Dis, 2014, 50(2): 354-358.
  • 7Reden J, Mueller A, Mueller C, et al. Recovery of olfaetory function following closed head injury or infections of the upper respiratory tract [ J]. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2006, 132(3) : 265-269.
  • 8Romhaux P, Mouraux A, Bertrand B, et al. Oliactory lunctlon and olfactory bulb volume in patients with postiufectious olfactory loss[J]. Laryngoscope, 2006, 116(3) : 436-439.
  • 9Rombaux P, Duprez T, Hummel T. Olfactory bulb vohnne in the clinical assessment of olfactory dysfunction[J]. Rhinology, 2009, 47(1) : 3-9.
  • 10Yousem DM, Geckle RJ, Bilker W, et al. MR ev.aluation of patients with congenital hyposmia or anosmia [ J ]. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 1996, 166(2) : 439-443.

引证文献3

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部