期刊文献+

改良Mainz Pouch Ⅱ尿流改道术的临床应用

Clinical Application of Modified Mainz Pouch Ⅱ Urinary Diversion
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨膀胱全切术后改良MainzpouchⅡ尿流改道术的临床应用价值。方法回顾性总结18例膀胱癌患者实施膀胱全切后采用改良MainzPouchⅡ尿流改道术的临床资料。结果本组尿流改道时间平均130(110—140)min,术中出血量平均383(200—800)ml,术后住院时间平均19.1(7—30)d。围手术期因多器官功能衰竭死亡1例(5.6%)。术后早期(1个月内)并发症发生率为44.4%(8/18),包括切口感染5例,切口裂开2例,延迟性肠梗阻1例,无尿瘘及肠瘘。远期(1个月后)并发症发生率为41.2%(7/17),包括肾盂肾炎1例,输尿管肠吻合口狭窄致单侧肾积水1例,持续非梗阻性腹痛1例;肾功能损害1例;代谢性酸中毒需长期服用碱剂者3例,其中需住院治疗者1例。白天控尿率100%,夜间控尿率1个月内为82.3%(14/17),1个月后达100%。排尿次数:术后1个月内白天6~8次,夜间3—5次,1个月后白天4—6次,夜间0—3次。病人对排尿和控尿评价“非常好”占29.4%(5/17),评价“好”占64.7%(11/17),评价“差”占5.9%(1/17),满意率达94.1%(16/17)。结论改良MainzPouchII尿流改道术操作简单、安全,临床疗效肯定,是目前较为理想的尿流改道替代方式。 Objective To explore the clinical application value of modified Mainz pouch Ⅱ urinary di- version after radical cystectomy. Method A total of 18 bladder cancer patients who underwent a reconstruc- tion of the Mainz pouch ]] urinary diversion after radical cystectomy were analyzed retrospectively. Results The average time of urinary diversion was 130 minutes (ranged 110 to 140 minutes), the average intra-opera- tive blood loss was 383 ml (ranged from 700 to 800 ml), and the average post-operative hospital stays were 19.1 days (ranged from 7 to 30 days). One case died of muhiple organ failure during the perioperative peri- od. The early postoperative complication rate (within 1 month of surgeon) was 44.4% (8/18) , including postoperative infection in 5 cases, disruption of wound in 2 cases and delay intestinal obstruction in 1 case. The long-term complication rate was 41.2% (7/17), including pyelonephritis in 1 case, unilateral hydrone- phrosis associated with ureter-intestinal anastomosis stenosis in 1 case, continuing non-obstructive abdominal pain in 1 case, renal functional lesion in 1 case and metabolic acidosis in 3 cases. The urinary continence rate during the day was 100%, and that during the night was 82.3% within 1 month and 100% one month after the operation. The patient's satisfaction with the diversion and the overall quality of life was described as very good in 29.4%, good in 64.7% and poor in 5.9% respectively, and the satisfied rate was 94.1%.Conclusions Themodified Mainz pouch Ⅱ urinary diversion is a simple and safe procedure with positive effect as low complication rate, good urinary continence and well quality of life. It is an ideal alternative procedure of continent urinary diversion.
出处 《中国现代手术学杂志》 2014年第1期62-65,共4页 Chinese Journal of Modern Operative Surgery
基金 甘肃省泌尿系疾病临床医学中心科研基金项目(201101)
关键词 乙状结肠直肠膀胱术 尿流改道术 膀胱切除术 膀胱肿瘤 reetosigmoid pouch urinary diversion eystectomy bladder neoplasms
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Fisch M, Wammack R, MUller SC, et al. The Mainz pouch II (sigma rectum pouch)[J]. J Urol, 1993, 149(2) :258-263.
  • 2Bastian PJ, Albers P, Hanitzsch H, et al. The modified uret- erosigmoidostomy ( Mainz pouch II) as a continent form of urinary diversion[J]. Urologe A, 2004, 43(8) :982-988.
  • 3Gumus E, Miroglu C, Saporta L, et al. Rectodynamic and radio- logical assessment in modified mainz pouch II cases [ J ]. EurUrol, 2000, 38(3) :316-322.
  • 4Pahernik S, Beetz R, Schede J, et al. Reetosigmoid pouch (MainzPouch II) in children[J]. J Urol, 2006, 175(1): 284-287.
  • 5Sherwani Afak Y, Wazir BS, Hamid A, et al. Comparative study of various forms of urinary diversion after radical cysteeto- my in muscle invasive carcinoma urinary bladder [ J ]. Int J Health Sei ( Qassim), 2009, 3 ( 1 ) : 3 -11.
  • 6Fisch M, Wammack R, Hohenfellner R. The sigma rectum pouch (Mainz pouch II) [J]. World J Urol, 1996, 14(2) :68-72.
  • 7Ignjatovic I, Basic D. Modified Mainz pouch II (Sigma Rectum pouch) urinary diversion: 12 years experience[J]. Acta Chir Iu- gosl, 2007, 54(4):73-77.
  • 8Sherwani Mak Y, Wazir BS, Hamid A, et al. Comparative study of various forms of urinary diversion after radical cystectomy in muscle invasive carcinoma urinary bladder [ J ]. Int J Health Sci (Qassim), 2009, 3(1) :3-11.
  • 9Loeser A, Neumann M, Kocot A, et al. Serum carcino - embryon- ic antigen (CEA) and its possible use as tumor marker for second- ary tumors in urinary intestinal reservoirs[ J]. Urel Oncol, 2013, 31(5) :644-648. doi: 10. 1016/j. urelonc. 2011. 02. 021.
  • 10Bastian PJ, Albers P, Haferkamp A, et al. Modified ureterosig- moidostomy (Mainz Pouch II) in different age groups and with dif- ferent techniques of ureteric implantation[J]. BJU Int, 2004, 94 (3) :345-349.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部