期刊文献+

风险框架情境下决策理性的老化研究 被引量:5

Development and aging of decision-making rationality under risk framework
下载PDF
导出
摘要 研究背景由于框架的影响,人们在决策时会表现出一些非理性选择和决策,但随着年龄的增长是否也存在老龄化效应,值得关注。方法以232例年轻人(青年组)和120例老年人(老年组)为被试进行2×2×2完全被试间试验。其中自变量包括决策情境的个体相关性(高相关性、低相关性)、框架价态(正框架、负框架)和年龄段(青年、老年);控制变量为风险概率,作为被试内变量(低概率为33%、高概率为40%),因变量为决策分数。观察风险框架决策情境下之风险决策理性,以及风险寻求倾向的增龄性变化。结果在风险决策框架情境下,老年组被试的非理性决策趋势更强(框架效应),正框架下决策评分为5.13±2.12、负框架下决策评分为6.55±1.05[F(1,118)=21.470,P=0.000;η2=0.156];青年组正框架下决策评分为3.18±2.49、负框架下决策评分为5.00±2.41[F(1,230)=31.260,P=0.000;η2=0.121]。老年组被试更倾向风险选择[F(1,350)=4.820,P=0.029]。结论情境框架发展过程中风险寻求趋势的增加及理性的轻微退行性改变,可以反映老年人眶额叶皮质及腹内侧前额叶皮质、杏仁核功能的老龄化,以及腹内侧前额叶皮质功能的良好维持。此外,老年人对风险概率的理解并未出现退行性改变,但可预示老年人对期望效应值的敏感性下降。 Background Humans often display irrational choice and decision-making due to the frame effect. However, it is unclear whether this irrational choice and decision-making will increase during the aging process. Methods The present research explored development and aging of risky-seeking and rational decision-making with 232 younger adults and 120 older adults. The experiment was a 2 (Age: younger adult and old adult) ~ 2 (Frame: positive and negative) x 2 (Relevance: lower level and higher level), with the risky probability as a control variable and the decision-making scores as dependent variables. Results The results revealed that older adults demonstrated much more irrational decision- making (framing effect). In the detail, the risky decision-making score of the older adults in the positive framing was 5.13 ± 2.12, and 6.55 ± 1.05 in the negative framing [F (1,118) = 21.470, P = 0.000; η^2= 0.156], while the risky decision-making score of the younger adults in the positive framing was 3.18 ±2.49, and 5.00 ±2.41 in the negative framing [F (1,230) = 31.260, P = 0.000; η^2= 0.121]. Meanwhile, the older adults showed risk seeking for the life-death scenario [F (1,350) = 4.820, P = 0.029]. Conclusions These results suggested that the hypofunction in orbital and medial prefrontal cortex and amygdale in older adults might be the underlying mechanisms. Furthermore, the susceptibility to expected value (EV) of the older adults might decrease although their scores in risky probability understanding were not significantly different from the younger adults.
出处 《中国现代神经疾病杂志》 CAS 2014年第3期186-191,共6页 Chinese Journal of Contemporary Neurology and Neurosurgery
基金 国家自然科学基金青年科学基金资助项目(项目编号:31000465)~~
关键词 风险调节 决策 衰老 Risk adjustment Decision making Aging
  • 相关文献

参考文献24

  • 1McConnel CS,Garry FB,Hill AE,Lombard JE,Gould DH.Conceptual modeling of postmortem evaluatlon findings to describe dairy cow deaths.J Dairy Sci,2010,93:373-386.
  • 2Thomas AK,Millar PR.Reducing the framing effect in older and younger adults by encouraging analytic processing.J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci,2012,67:139-149.
  • 3GamlielE,Herstein R.Involvement moderates the effect of message framing on consumers" perceived monetary gain and product choice.J Prod Brand Manage,2013,22:142-152.
  • 4Mata R,Josef AK,Samanez-Larkin GR,Hertwig R.Age differences in risky choice:a meta-analysis.Ann NY Acad Sci,2011,1235:18-29.
  • 5Park DC,Polk TA,Hebrank AC,Jenkins LJ.Age differences in default mode activity on easy and difficult spatial judgment tasks.Front Hum Neurosci,2010,3:75.
  • 6Karlamangla AS,Miller-Martinez D,Aneshensel CS,Seeman TE,Wight RG,Chodosh J.Trajectories of cognitive function in late life in the United States:demographic and socioeconomic predictors.Am J Epidemiol,2009,170:331-342.
  • 7Sahhouse TA.Influence of age on practice effects in longitudinal neurocognitive change.Neuropsychology,2010,24:563-572.
  • 8Jayanti RK.Accentuate the positive:elderly responses to health communications.J Marketing Theory Pr,2010,18:263-273.
  • 9de Bruin WB,Parker AM,Fischhoff B.Explaining adult age differences in decision-making competence.J Behav Decis Making,2012,25:325-360.
  • 10De Martino B,Kumaran D,Seymour B,Dolan RJ.Frames,biases,and rational decision-making in the human brain.Science,2006,313:684-687.

二级参考文献11

  • 1Tversky A, Kahneman D. The framing of decisions and the rationality of choice. Science, 1981,221:453 -458.
  • 2Levin I P, Schneider S L, Gaeth G J. All frames are not created equal: typology and critical analysis of framing effects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1998,76(2) : 149 - 188.
  • 3Smith S M, Levin I P. Need for cognition and choice framing effects. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 1996,9:283 - 293.
  • 4Venkatraman S, Aloysius J A, Davis F D. Multiple prospect framing and decision behavior: The mediational roles of perceived riskiness and perceived ambiguity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,2006,101:59 - 73.
  • 5Maule J,Joubert G V. What lies beneath: Reframing framing effects. Thinking & Reasoning, 2007,13 ( 1 ) :25 - 44.
  • 6Ben - Zur H, Bresnitz S J. The effects of time pressure on risky choice behaviour. Acta Psychologica, 1981,47 : 89 - 104.
  • 7Takemura K. Influence of elaboration on the framing of decision. The Journal of Psychology, 1994,128:33 - 39.
  • 8Roszkowski M J, Snelbecker G E. Effects of "framing" on measures of risk: Financial planners are not immune. The Journal of Behavioral Economics, 1990,19:237 - 246.
  • 9Marteau T M. Framing of information: Its influence upon decisions of doctors and patients. British Journal of Social Psychology, 1989,28:89 - 94.
  • 10Leippe M R,Eisenstadt D, Dauch S M, et al.. Timing of eye witness expert testimony, jurors need for cognition, and case strength as determinants of trail verdicts. Journal of Applied Psychology ,2004,89 : 524 - 541.

共引文献9

同被引文献76

引证文献5

二级引证文献34

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部