期刊文献+

去甲肾上腺素影响脓毒性休克被动抬腿试验判断液体反应性的临床研究 被引量:1

The Influence of Norepinephrine on Prediction of Fluid Responsiveness by Passive Leg Raising during Septic Shock
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨去甲肾上腺素对脓毒性休克患者被动抬腿试验(PLR)预测液体反应性的影响。方法采用前瞻性观察研究的方法,收集2012年9月至2012年11月南京大学医学院附属鼓楼医院重症医学科收治的46例脓毒性休克患者的临床资料,其中36例PLR阳性患者纳入研究,以PLR实施1 min后每博输出量指数(SVI)增加(ΔSVI=SVI变化值/基础SVI)≥10%,定义为PLR阳性,提示有液体反应性。纳入研究后患者均先行第1次PLR(PLR1),然后体位改为平卧并稳定}后,给予去甲肾上腺素静脉泵入或增加去甲肾上腺素治疗剂量维持MAP≥65 mm Hg,稳定20 min后,行第2次PLR(PLR2)。采用脉搏轮廓连续心排出量监测(PiCCO)法监测患者心率(HR)、平均动脉压(MAP)、中心静脉压(CVP)、心排指数(CI)、每搏输出量指数(SVI)、外周血管阻力指数(SVRI)、全心舒张末期容积指数(GEDVI)、心功能指数(CFI)等血流动力学指标。观察患者去甲肾上腺素治疗后PLR及其他血流动力学监测指标的变化。结果实施PLR1时SVI增加,ΔSVI为(20.54±9.63)%,CI增加(20.57±9.89)%,MAP升高(7.64±5.77)%,CVP亦升高(25.83±23.39)%。给予去甲肾上腺素静脉泵入或增加去甲肾上腺素治疗剂量后SVI增加,ΔSVI(16.97±9.06)%,CI增加(16.78±8.39)%,GEDVI增加(9.08±4.47)%MAP升高(28.07±12.48)%,CVP增加(7.86±8.52)%。实施PLR2时SVI增加,ΔSVI(13.74±8.79)%,CI增加(13.79±9.08)%,MAP升高(2.93±5.06)%,CVP升高(13.36±4.74)%,与PLR1比较,去甲肾上腺素治疗后及PLR2时ΔSVI均显著降低(P均<0.05)。实施PLR2时6例患者SVI增加<10%,即无液体反应性。结论去甲肾上腺素增加PLR阳性脓毒性休克患者的心脏前负荷,增加心排出量,影响液体反应性。 Objective To explore the influence of norepinephrine on the prediction of fluid responsiveness by passive leg raising ( PLR) during septic shock. Methods Forty-six septic shock patientsin intensive care unit of Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital were prospectively observed from September to November 2012. Among which 36 septic shock patients were enrolled with a positive PLR test ( defined by an increase in stroke volume index ≥10% ) . A PLR testwas performed at baseline ( PLR1) . A second PLR test ( PLR2) was performed at returning to supine position for 10 min and the dose of norepinephrine was increased to maintain MAP ≥65 mmHg for 20 min. The changes of heart rate( HR) , mean arterial pressure ( MAP) , central venous pressure( CVP) , cardiac index( CI) , stroke volume index( SVI) , index of systemic vascular resistance( SVRI) , global end-diastolic volume index( GEDVI) , and cardiac function index( CFI) were monitored by transpulmonary thermodilution technique ( PiCCO) .Results PLR1 significantly increased SVI by ( 20. 54 ±9. 63) % , CI by ( 20. 57 ±9. 89) % , MAP by ( 7. 64 ±5. 77) % , and CVP by ( 25. 83 ±23. 39) % . As the dose of norepinephrine increased, SVI was increased by ( 16. 97 ±9. 06) % , CI by ( 16. 78 ±8. 39) % , GEDVI by ( 9. 08 ±4. 47) % , MAP by ( 28. 07 ±12. 48) % , and CVP by ( 7. 86 ±8. 52) % . PLR2 increased SVI by ( 13. 74 ±8. 79) % , CI by ( 13. 79 ±9. 08) % , MAP by ( 2. 93 ±5. 06) % , and CVP by ( 13. 36 ±14. 74) % . The PLR2 and the dose increase of norepinephrine augmented SVI to a significantly lesser extent than the PLR1 performed at baseline ( both P 〈 0. 05) . However, SVI increased by 〈10% in 6 patients while the baseline PLR was positive in these patients. Conclusion In septic patients with a positive PLR at baseline, norepinephrine increases cardiac preload and cardiac output and influences the fluid responsiveness.
出处 《中国呼吸与危重监护杂志》 CAS 2014年第2期154-157,共4页 Chinese Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
关键词 脓毒性休克 去甲肾上腺素 液体反应性 心脏前负荷 心排出量 被动抬腿试验 Septic shock Norepinephrine Fluid responsiveness Cardiac preload Cardiacoutput Passive leg raising
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Michard F, Teboul JL. Predicting fluid responsiveness in ICU patients : a critical analysis of the evidence. Chest, 2002,121 : 2000- 2008.
  • 2Hamzaoui O, Georger JF, Monnet X, et al. Early administration of norepinephrine increases cardiac preload and cardiac output in septie patients with life-threatening hypotension. Critical Care, 2010,14 : R142.
  • 3Levy MM, Fink MP, Marshall JC, et al. 2001 SCCM/ESICM/ACCP/ ATS/SIS international sepsis deflnitionsconference. Crit Care Med, 2003,31 : 1250-1256.
  • 4Preau S, Saulnier F, Dewavrin F, et al. Passive leg raising is predictive of fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing patients with severe sepsis or acute panereatitis. Crit Care Med, 2010,38 : 819-825.
  • 5张少雷,孙荣青.血管升压药物在感染性休克中的应用[J].中国呼吸与危重监护杂志,2011,10(3):209-210. 被引量:10
  • 6Cavallaro F, Sandroni C, Antonelli monitoring and dynamic indices of Anestesiol, 2008,74 : 123 -135.
  • 7M. Functional hemodynamic fluid responsiveness. Minerva Chew MS, Aneman A. Haemodynamie monitoring using arterial waveform analysis. Curr Opiu Crit Care,2013,19:234-241.
  • 8Cavallaro F, Sandroni C, Marano C, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of passive leg raising for prediction of fluid responsiveness in adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical studies. Intensive Care Med,2010,36 : 1475-1483.
  • 9Proau S, Saulnier F, Dewavrin F, et al. Passive leg raising is predictive of fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing patients with severe sepsis or acute pancreatitis. Crit Care Med, 2010,38 : 819-825.
  • 10Marik PE, Cavallazzi R, Vasu T, et al. Dynamic changes in arterial waveform derived variables and fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients:a systematic review of the literature. Crit Care Med ,2009,37:2642-2647.

共引文献9

同被引文献14

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部