摘要
目的探讨去甲肾上腺素对脓毒性休克患者被动抬腿试验(PLR)预测液体反应性的影响。方法采用前瞻性观察研究的方法,收集2012年9月至2012年11月南京大学医学院附属鼓楼医院重症医学科收治的46例脓毒性休克患者的临床资料,其中36例PLR阳性患者纳入研究,以PLR实施1 min后每博输出量指数(SVI)增加(ΔSVI=SVI变化值/基础SVI)≥10%,定义为PLR阳性,提示有液体反应性。纳入研究后患者均先行第1次PLR(PLR1),然后体位改为平卧并稳定}后,给予去甲肾上腺素静脉泵入或增加去甲肾上腺素治疗剂量维持MAP≥65 mm Hg,稳定20 min后,行第2次PLR(PLR2)。采用脉搏轮廓连续心排出量监测(PiCCO)法监测患者心率(HR)、平均动脉压(MAP)、中心静脉压(CVP)、心排指数(CI)、每搏输出量指数(SVI)、外周血管阻力指数(SVRI)、全心舒张末期容积指数(GEDVI)、心功能指数(CFI)等血流动力学指标。观察患者去甲肾上腺素治疗后PLR及其他血流动力学监测指标的变化。结果实施PLR1时SVI增加,ΔSVI为(20.54±9.63)%,CI增加(20.57±9.89)%,MAP升高(7.64±5.77)%,CVP亦升高(25.83±23.39)%。给予去甲肾上腺素静脉泵入或增加去甲肾上腺素治疗剂量后SVI增加,ΔSVI(16.97±9.06)%,CI增加(16.78±8.39)%,GEDVI增加(9.08±4.47)%MAP升高(28.07±12.48)%,CVP增加(7.86±8.52)%。实施PLR2时SVI增加,ΔSVI(13.74±8.79)%,CI增加(13.79±9.08)%,MAP升高(2.93±5.06)%,CVP升高(13.36±4.74)%,与PLR1比较,去甲肾上腺素治疗后及PLR2时ΔSVI均显著降低(P均<0.05)。实施PLR2时6例患者SVI增加<10%,即无液体反应性。结论去甲肾上腺素增加PLR阳性脓毒性休克患者的心脏前负荷,增加心排出量,影响液体反应性。
Objective To explore the influence of norepinephrine on the prediction of fluid responsiveness by passive leg raising ( PLR) during septic shock.
Methods Forty-six septic shock patientsin intensive care unit of Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital were prospectively observed from September to November 2012. Among which 36 septic shock patients were enrolled with a positive PLR test ( defined by an increase in stroke volume index ≥10% ) . A PLR testwas performed at baseline ( PLR1) . A second PLR test ( PLR2) was performed at returning to supine position for 10 min and the dose of norepinephrine was increased to maintain MAP ≥65 mmHg for 20 min. The changes of heart rate( HR) , mean arterial pressure ( MAP) , central venous pressure( CVP) , cardiac index( CI) , stroke volume index( SVI) , index of systemic vascular resistance( SVRI) , global end-diastolic volume index( GEDVI) , and cardiac function index( CFI) were monitored by transpulmonary thermodilution technique ( PiCCO) .Results PLR1 significantly increased SVI by ( 20. 54 ±9. 63) % , CI by ( 20. 57 ±9. 89) % , MAP by ( 7. 64 ±5. 77) % , and CVP by ( 25. 83 ±23. 39) % . As the dose of norepinephrine increased, SVI was increased by ( 16. 97 ±9. 06) % , CI by ( 16. 78 ±8. 39) % , GEDVI by ( 9. 08 ±4. 47) % , MAP by ( 28. 07 ±12. 48) % , and CVP by ( 7. 86 ±8. 52) % . PLR2 increased SVI by ( 13. 74 ±8. 79) % , CI by ( 13. 79 ±9. 08) % , MAP by ( 2. 93 ±5. 06) % , and CVP by ( 13. 36 ±14. 74) % . The PLR2 and the dose increase of norepinephrine augmented SVI to a significantly lesser extent than the PLR1 performed at baseline ( both P 〈 0. 05) . However, SVI increased by 〈10% in 6 patients while the baseline PLR was positive in these patients. Conclusion In septic patients with a positive PLR at baseline, norepinephrine increases cardiac preload and cardiac output and influences the fluid responsiveness.
出处
《中国呼吸与危重监护杂志》
CAS
2014年第2期154-157,共4页
Chinese Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine