摘要
我国学者的构式思想与西方学者的构式语法的基本主张是一致的,但是也有一些差异。前者的思想同样也有重大的理论价值,但是没有发展为影响重大的理论。从这一个案可以看出中西语言理论建设方式的差异;比较而言,我国的语言理论建设方式存在三个方面的不足:学派意识不够、渗透的领域和范围受限以及表述方式不"显豁"。
The essence of the Chinese version of constructional approach coincides with con- struction grammar created by Western scholars,but there are some differences between the two approaches. Although it is of great theoretical significance as well,the former approach has not turned to be a very influential theory. This case can show the differences between the ways the linguistic theories are established in the West and China respectively. There are three weak points in the establishment of linguistic theories in China:inadequate awareness of aca- demic schools;limited diffusion of the ideas and implicitness of the expressing way.
出处
《汉语学习》
CSSCI
北大核心
2014年第2期3-10,共8页
Chinese Language Learning
关键词
构式
构式语法
理论建设差异
原因
construction
construction grammar
differences in theoretical establishment
causes