从替曹操等人翻案谈评价历史人物的标准问题

From Reversing the Verdict on the Behalf of Cao Cao Etal Talking about the Evaluation Criteria of Historical Figures

广大民众出于社会良知,约定俗成地形成了鉴别历史人物的一般标准。这些以道义为基本内容的评价标准,是推动人类社会向前发展的正能量。人性的光辉,使历史上许多志士仁人,超越阶级樊篱,关注国家前途、社会和谐和人类的命运,保持高尚的品格和情操。肯定这样的历史人物,有利于积极地引导社会历史向良性方向发展。而个人建立的事功无论多大,也不等同于历史贡献。不论是非,单以事功为标准评价人物,对人类社会的进步会产生负面效应。数十年来,史学界对草菅人命、给后世造成恶劣影响的曹操等人翻案,有悖于正确的评价标准,分明站错了立场,是反人类、反文明、反历史的。

The majority of the people, for humanity and social conscience, formed four criteria to identify the historical figure. Human glory, moral evaluation of the basic content standards, has a positive energy to promote the development of human socie- ty. The history of many people with lofty ideals, beyond the barriers of class, shoulder all the burdens moral, concerned about the country~ future and the fate of mankind. The history of one of the Chinese nation, but also numerous people with lofty ideals for the country and the people in the history of struggle. Individuals to establish feats no matter how much, is not equivalent to the historical contribution. Whether single figures feats as standard evaluation has a negative effect on the development of human society. Decades, historians of the non - evil, adverse effects to future generations, Cao Cao et al reversing the verdict is contrary to the proper evaluation standards, standing in the wrong position, is anti - people, anti - historical.