1[1]Barcelona,A. On the plausibility of claiming a metonymic motivation for conceptual metaphor[A].Barcelona.Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads[C].Berlin/ New York: Moulton de Gruyter,2000.
2[2]Hopper,P.& Traugott, E. Grammaticalization[M].Cambridge:CUP,1993.
4[4]Lakoff,G.Woman,Fire and Dangerous Things[M].Chicago:University of Chicago Press,1987.
5[5]Lakoff,G.and M.Johnson.Metaphors We Live By[M].Chicago:University of Chicago Press,1980.
6[6]Langacker,R.Grammar and Conceptualization[M].Berlin/New York:Moulton de Gruyter,1999.
7[7]Langacker,R.Topic,subject and possessor[A].Simonsen & Endresen.A Cognitive Approach to the Verb:Morphorlogical and Constructional Perspectives[C].Berlin/New York:Moulton de Gruyter,2001.
8[8]Langacker,R.Concept, Image and Symbol:the Cognitive Basis of Grammar(2nd Edition)[M]. Berlin/New York:Moulton de Gruyter,2002.
9[9]Levinson,S.C.Presumptive Meanings:the Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicatures[M].Cambridge,Massachusetts/London:the MIT Press,2000.
10[10]Panther,K & Thornburg, L. The potentiality for actuality metonymy in English and Hungarian [A].Panther & Radden.Metonymy in Language and Thought[C].Amsterdam:John Benjamins,1999.
