摘要
合议庭的评议是审判运行机制中的最核心部分,其合理运作直接决定着审判制度功能的发挥。构建一个科学、合理的评议程序是实现司法裁判结果公正、合理的有效保障。我国有关评议制度的法律规定本身并不健全,合议庭评议规则存在漏洞。合议庭可将各法官对某案件态度的偏好汇集成群体偏好,然后做出优劣排序或从中选优而形成一个总的裁判决策。
The deliberation of collegiate bench is the central part of the trial operation mechanism, which will directly determine the operation of the judicial system. Constructing a scientific and reason- able evaluation program is the effective safeguard that realizes fair and reasonable judicial referee re-suits. The law on deliberation system in China itself is not sound, because there are loopholes in eval-uation rules. The collegiate bench condenses all individuals' preferences of judges into group prefer-ence and arranges in order or select the best scheme by comparison to form a general juridical deci-sion.
出处
《重庆理工大学学报(社会科学)》
CAS
2014年第3期22-25,57,共5页
Journal of Chongqing University of Technology(Social Science)
基金
教育部人文社科项目"司法裁判中法官理性实现的逻辑分析"(10YJCZH039)
湘潭大学诉讼法学研究中心开放课题"民事裁判的博弈分析"(12fx005)的阶段性成果
关键词
合议庭
评议决策
偏好逻辑
collegial panel
appraisal decision-making
preference logic