期刊文献+

基于学生满意度的高校教学质量评价实证研究 被引量:4

Empirical study of the teaching quality evaluation in colleges and universities based on student satisfaction
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在SERVQUAL模型基础上,以南京部分高校为样本,从学生满意度的视角研究高校教学质量水平,结果显示:大部分学生对高校教学质量给予较正面、肯定的评价,学生认知的教学质量与其对教学质量的整体满意度之间呈显著正相关关系。但在教学内容、教学管理方面,学生所期望的教学服务水平与其实际感受之间存在一定的落差,特别在教学管理方面,教工对学生期望的认知与学生实际期望相差较大。高等学校应突破传统的教学方式,主动积极地与学生沟通,深层次地把握学生对教学服务的真正需求,减少教学中出现的问题,提高教学质量。 This paper evaluates the teaching quality from students' satisfaction based on the model of SE- RVQUAL. The results show that most of the college students give positive evaluation of the quality, and that there is a significant positive correlation between the students' recognized teaching quality and the overall satisfaction of teaching quality. But in terms of teaching content and teaching management, there exists a certain gap between the student' s desired level of service in teaching and their actual feelings. Especially in the aspect of teaching manage- ment, there is a large difference between faculty' expected recognition from students and the actual recognition. Colleges and universities should break away from the traditional teaching methodology and communicate with students actively to understand students' real needs, so as to reduce teaching problems and improve teaching quali- ty.
作者 赵波 李瑞芝
出处 《南京邮电大学学报(社会科学版)》 2014年第1期99-105,共7页 Journal of Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications(Social Science Edition)
基金 江苏省社科基金项目"江苏高校师生关系研究"(11JYC9) 中国电子学会重点项目"教学研究型大学发展性教师评价体系研究"(ZDJ11115)
关键词 学生满意度 教学质量评价 SERVQUAL模型 student satisfaction evaluation of teaching quality Model of SERVQUAL
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1刘婧姝.高校扩招对教学质量的影响及对策[J].理论观察,2003(4):109-110. 被引量:1
  • 2申卫星.高等学校教学质量评价指标体系研究[D].上海:东华大学,2003.
  • 3PARASURAMAN A, ZEITHAML V A, BERRY L. SE- RVQUAL: A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality [ J ]. Retailing: Crit Concepts Bk2,2004( 1 ) :140.
  • 4ZEITHAML V A. Defining and relating price, perceived quality, and perceived value [ M ]. Cambridge, MA : Mar- keting science institute, 1987.
  • 5OLAHAVSKY R W. Perceived quality in consumer deci- sion making: An integrated theoretical perspective [ G ]// JACDBY J, OLSON J C. Perceived quality:How consumers view stdres and merchandise. Lexington: D. C. Heath, 1985 : 1 - 29.
  • 6HOLBROOK M B, CORFMAN K P. Quality and value in the consumption experience : Phaedrus rides again [ J ]. Perceived quality, 1985 ( 31 ) : 31 - 57.
  • 7SELNES F, GCNHAUG K. Effects of supplier reliability and benevolence in business marketing [ J ]. Journal of Business Research,2000 (3) :259 - 271.
  • 8URBANY J E, DICKSON P R, SAWYER A G. Insights in- to cross-and within-store price search:Retailer estimates vs. consumer self-reports [ J ]. Journal of Retailing, 2000 (2) :243 -258.
  • 9MCGOLDRICK P J, ANDRE E. Consumer misbehaviour: Promiscuity or loyalty in grocery shopping [ J ]. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 1997 (2) :73 -81.
  • 10SPRENG R A, DROGE C. The impact on satisfaction of managing attribute expectations: Should performance claims be understated or overstated [ J ]. Journal of Retai- ling and Consumer Services,2001 (5) :261 -274.

共引文献1

同被引文献16

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部