期刊文献+

免疫捕捉PCR和经典PCR方法检测水稻细菌性谷枯病菌灵敏性比较 被引量:2

Sensitivity comparison of the ISE method and classical PCR to detect Burkholderia glumae
下载PDF
导出
摘要 将免疫吸附富集(ISE)和经典PCR结合以提高水稻细菌性谷枯病的检测效率,并且利用多克隆抗体技术成功地获得了4种抗血清,即抗Burkholderia glumae全菌体血清ASBg14,ASBg32,ASBg26和ASBg04,ODD法测定该4种抗血清的效价均达到1∶32以上,利用凝聚法测定的所有抗血清的效价也均达到了1∶5 120以上,通过两种方法结合测定效价均显示为合格抗体。通过对4种抗血清的专化性进行研究,结果显示ASBg14和ASBg32专化性较高,抗血清ASBg26和ASBg04专化性不是很理想。用直接PCR技术和免疫捕捉PCR技术检测谷枯病菌,结果表明,所有谷枯病菌都能产生500 bp左右的特异性片段,非谷枯病菌的8个菌株均无特异性片段产生。两种检测方法的灵敏度比较发现,直接PCR技术能检测到1×105cfu·mL-1左右的悬浮液,免疫捕捉PCR技术能检测到103cfu·mL-1左右悬浮液,免疫捕捉PCR比直接PCR灵敏性提高102倍。检测人工接种的病稻种实验中,直接PCR技术能检测到2粒及以上带菌种子制得浸悬液,而免疫捕捉PCR技术仅1粒带菌种子即可。 The present study combined the fluoride ion-selective electrode ( ISE) method with classical PCR to increase the detection efficiency.The 4 antisera of rabbit anti whole cell of B.glumae have been successfully obtained by common serological method , which were ASBg14, ASBg32, ASBg26 and ASBg04.The antibody of 4 antisera could be effective when diluted by 5 120 times and reached 1∶32 by ODD test.The specificity of antibody of ASBg14 and ASBg32 was very high; however, the specificity of ASBg26 and ASBg04 was not very satisfying.The results showed that all the strains of B.glumae tested produced 500 bp specific fragments by the ISE and the direct PCR method, while others showed negative PCR result .Comparing the sensitivity of these 2 detecting methods, about 1 ×105 cfu·mL-1 of the bacterial suspension were detected by direct PCR and below 1 ×103 cfu·mL-1 can only be detected by immunocapture PCR method .In the detecting experiments of the artificial inoculated seeds , at least 2 seeds should be required by direct PCR;however, only 1 seed was enough for detection by immunocapture PCR .
出处 《浙江农业学报》 CSCD 北大核心 2014年第2期371-377,共7页 Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis
基金 上海科委重点攻关项目(08391911400)
关键词 免疫捕捉 水稻 细菌性谷枯病 PCR ISE PCR rice Burkholderia glumae
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献52

  • 1任毓忠,李晖,李国英,王晓东,万刚,方蕾.哈密瓜细菌性果斑病种子带菌的PCR检测[J].新疆农业科学,2004,41(5):329-332. 被引量:18
  • 2漆艳香,谢艺贤,张辉强,朱水芳,肖启明,廖晓兰.香蕉细菌性枯萎病菌实时荧光PCR检测方法的建立[J].华南热带农业大学学报,2005,11(1):1-5. 被引量:16
  • 3蔡学清,黄月英,杨建珍,陈军,蔡国隆,胡方平.福建省西瓜细菌性果斑病的病原鉴定[J].福建农林大学学报(自然科学版),2005,34(4):434-437. 被引量:23
  • 4夏明星,赵文军,马青,朱水芳.番茄细菌性溃疡病菌的实时荧光PCR检测[J].植物病理学报,2006,36(2):152-157. 被引量:21
  • 5简锦忠 张义璋.台湾水稻新病害--稻细菌性谷枯病[J].中国农业研究,(Jour agric.Res.China),1983,32(4):360-366.
  • 6Goto M. Fundamentals of Bacterial Plant Pathology. California: Academic Press, 1992.
  • 7Shahjahan A K M, Rush M C, Groth D. Panicle blight recent research points to a bacterial cause. Rice J, 2002, 103 : 26-28.
  • 8Sogou K. The present situation of bacterial grain rot of rice. Plant Prot, 1985, 39: 396-402.
  • 9Luo J Y, Xie G L, Li B, et al. First report of Burkholderia glumae isolated from symptomless rice seeds in China. Plant Dis, 2007, 91(10): 1363.
  • 10Sayler R J, Cartwright R D, Yang Y N. Genetic characterization and real-time PCR detection of Burkholderia glumae, a newly emerging bacterial pathogen of rice in the United States. PlantDis, 2006, 90: 603-610.

共引文献56

同被引文献29

引证文献2

二级引证文献21

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部