美国陪审团的规模问题
摘要
美国联邦最高法院在上世纪70年代通过一系列判决否定了陪审团一般应由12人组成这一有着数百年历史的司法传统。此后,联邦和州法院系统对陪审团规模的要求均有所降低,引发了大量争论。虽然陪审团规模的减小有利于缩减司法成本,但同时也会对陪审员来源的广泛性、评议开展的充分性以及裁决结果的稳定性产生不良影响,因此回归到12人的规模才是更好的选择。
出处
《云南大学学报（法学版）》
2014年第2期110-117,共8页
Jorunal of Yunan University Law Edition
参考文献54
-
1People v. Rodriguez, 112 P. 3d 710.
-
2Adam M. Chud & Michael L. Berman, Six- member juries: does size really matter, 67 Tenn. L. Rev. 743,744(Spring,2000).
-
3B. Thayer, The jury and its development, 5 Harv. L. R. 295(February 15, 1892).
-
4Robert H. Miller, Six of one is not a dozen of the other: a reexamination of Williams v. Florida and the size of state criminal juries, 146 U. Pa. L. Rev. 621,632 ( January , 1998 ).
-
5Robert H. Miller, Six of one is not a dozen of the other: a reexamination of Williams v. Florida and the size of state criminal juries, 146 U. Pa. L. Rev. 621,638 -639(January ,1998). Larry T. Bates, Trial by jury after Williams v. Florida,10 Hamline L. Rev. 61 (1987).
-
6Thompson v. Utah, 170 U.S. 343.
-
7Thompson v. Utah, 170 U.S. 343,346-347.
-
8Thompson v. Utah, 170 U. S. 343,349 - 350 ( 1898 ).
-
9Thompson v. Utah, 170 U. S. 343,350(1898).
-
10Capital Traction Co. v. Hof, 174 U. S. 1(1899).
二级参考文献82
-
1Shari Seidman Diamond,Mary R.Rose﹠Beth Murphy,Revisiting The Unanimity Requirement:the Behavior of the Non-unanimous CivilJury,100Northwestern University Law Review,229,230(2006).
-
2Jeremy Osher,Jury Unanimity in California:Should It Say or Should It Go?,29Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review,1323,1324(April,1996).
-
3James Kachmar,Silencing the Minorrity:Permitting Nonunanious Jury Verdicts in Crinminal Trials,28Pacific Law Journal,287,288(Fall,1996).
-
4Lisa Caucci,Evaluating the Constitutionality of Proposals to Allow Non-unanimous Juries to Impose the Death Penalty in Georgia,26GeoigiaState University Law Review,1003(Spring,2010).
-
5Glasser,Edward P.Schwartz,Warren F.Schwartz,Leib,Morehead.
-
6Edward P.Schwartz﹠Warren F.Schwartz,And So Say Some of Us……What to Do with When Jurors Disagree,9Southern California In-terdisciplinary Law Journal,429(Spring,2000).
-
7Jere W.Morehead,A“Modest”Proposal for Jury Reform:The Elimination of Required Unanimous Jury Verdicts,46Kansas Law Review,933(June,1998).
-
8Michael H.Glasser,Letting the Supermajority Rule:Nonunaimous Jury Verdicts in Criminal Trials,24Florida State University Law Review.659(1997).
-
9Ethan J.Leib,Supermajoritarianism and the American Criminal Jury,33Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly,141(Winter/Spring,2006).
-
10Mi-chael H.Glasser,Letting the Supermajority Rule:Nonunaimous Jury Verdicts in Criminal Trials,24Florida State University Law Review,659(1997).
-
1夏旭虹.陪审团与美国的司法审判[J].河北法学,1999,17(4):97-97.
-
2李锋.转型:政府规模与机构改革[J].理论月刊,2003(2):48-50. 被引量：1
-
3天主教陪审团[J].乡镇论坛,1999,0(9):34-34.
-
4王磊.论英国陪审团的功能转变[J].贵州社会科学,2008(6):131-136. 被引量：1
-
5齐卫平.执政党组织规模问题的研究不要陷入误区[J].中国党政干部论坛,2012(12):36-38. 被引量：12
-
6任蓉.撩开陪审团裁决的神秘面纱——以评议内容为考察重点[J].湖北第二师范学院学报,2011,28(12):58-60.
-
7李兴国.新中国第一次现代化进程探析[J].甘肃理论学刊,2009(2):38-41.
-
8林芳,谢辉.定位、关系、目标——知联会建设的三个命题[J].中央社会主义学院学报,2012(4):66-70. 被引量：3
-
9张慎思.风乍起,吹绉了大西洋──英国少女露易丝·伍德沃德在美杀婴案[J].中国律师,1998(6):52-54.
-
10朱光磊.科学认识中国公务员的规模问题[J].学习与研究,2006(5):51-52.
