期刊文献+

An integrated graphic–taxonomic–associative approach to analyze human factors in aviation accidents 被引量:8

An integrated graphic–taxonomic–associative approach to analyze human factors in aviation accidents
原文传递
导出
摘要 Human factors are critical causes of modern aviation accidents. However, existing accident analysis methods encounter limitations in addressing aviation human factors, especially in complex accident scenarios. The existing graphic approaches are effective for describing accident mechanisms within various categories of human factors, but cannot simultaneously describe inad- equate human-aircraft-environment interactions and organizational deficiencies effectively, and highly depend on analysts' skills and experiences. Moreover, the existing methods do not emphasize latent unsafe factors outside accidents. This paper focuses on the above three limitations and proposes an integrated graphi^taxonomic-associative approach. A new graphic model named accident tree (AceiTree), with a two-mode structure and a reaction-based concept, is developed for accident modeling and safety defense identification. The AcciTree model is then integrated with the well-established human factors analysis and classification system (HFACS) to enhance both reliability of the graphic part and logicality of the taxonomic part for improving completeness of analysis. An associative hazard analysis technique is further put forward to extend analysis to fac- tors outside accidents, to form extended safety requirements for proactive accident prevention. Two crash examples, a research flight demonstrator by our team and an industrial unmanned aircraft, illustrate that the integrated approach is effective for identifying more unsafe factors and safety requirements. Human factors are critical causes of modern aviation accidents. However, existing accident analysis methods encounter limitations in addressing aviation human factors, especially in complex accident scenarios. The existing graphic approaches are effective for describing accident mechanisms within various categories of human factors, but cannot simultaneously describe inad- equate human-aircraft-environment interactions and organizational deficiencies effectively, and highly depend on analysts' skills and experiences. Moreover, the existing methods do not emphasize latent unsafe factors outside accidents. This paper focuses on the above three limitations and proposes an integrated graphi^taxonomic-associative approach. A new graphic model named accident tree (AceiTree), with a two-mode structure and a reaction-based concept, is developed for accident modeling and safety defense identification. The AcciTree model is then integrated with the well-established human factors analysis and classification system (HFACS) to enhance both reliability of the graphic part and logicality of the taxonomic part for improving completeness of analysis. An associative hazard analysis technique is further put forward to extend analysis to fac- tors outside accidents, to form extended safety requirements for proactive accident prevention. Two crash examples, a research flight demonstrator by our team and an industrial unmanned aircraft, illustrate that the integrated approach is effective for identifying more unsafe factors and safety requirements.
出处 《Chinese Journal of Aeronautics》 SCIE EI CAS CSCD 2014年第2期226-240,共15页 中国航空学报(英文版)
基金 co-supported by the Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University of Ministry of Education of China (IRT0905) the Step Program of Beijing Key Laboratory (No. Z121104002812053)
关键词 Accidents Accident model Accident tree Associative hazard analysis Human factors Human-aircraft-environ-ment reaction Integrated graphic-taxonomic Accidents Accident model Accident tree Associative hazard analysis Human factors Human-aircraft-environ-ment reaction Integrated graphic-taxonomic
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献121

共引文献164

同被引文献56

  • 1卜晓敏.航空人为因素事故/事件分析模型研究[D].天津:中国民航大学,2009.
  • 2金迪.航空公司运行不安全事件安全风险管理方法研究[D].上海:上海交通大学工业工程学院,2013.
  • 3NETJASOV F,JANIC M.A review of research on risk and safety modelling in civil aviation[J].Journal of Air Transport Management,2008,14(4):213-220.
  • 4ZHOU C C,HU D D.Research on inducement to accident/incident of civil aviation in southwest of China based on grey incidence analysis[J].Procedia Engineering,2012,45:942-949.
  • 5KNECHT W R.The "killing zone" revisited:Serial nonlinearities predict general aviation accident rates from pilot total flight hours[J].Accident Analysis & Prevention,2013,60:50-56.
  • 6WONG D K Y,PITFIELD D E,CAVES R E,et al.Quantifying and characterising aviation accident risk factors[J].Journal of Air Transport Management,2006,12(6):352-357.
  • 7张凤,于广涛,李永娟,蒋丽,董雷.影响我国民航飞行安全的个体与组织因素——基于HFACS框架的事件分析[J].中国安全科学学报,2007,17(10):67-74. 被引量:38
  • 8Shappell S, Detwiler C, Holcomb K, et al. Human Error and Commercial Aviation Accidents:an Analysis using the Hu- man Factors Analysis and Classification System [ J ]. Human Factors,2007,49 (2) : 227 - 42.
  • 9Cherry. Trends in Accidents and Fatalities in Large Transport Aircraft [ R ]. Washington: FAA,2010.
  • 10Salmon P M, Cornelissen M,Trotter M J. Systems- based Ac- cident Analysis Methods : A Comparison of Accimap, HFACS and STAMP[ J]. Safety Science,2012,50(4) : 1158 - 1170.

引证文献8

二级引证文献32

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部