期刊文献+

用Delta法求两水平研究中信度的置信区间

下载PDF
导出
摘要 信度λj和λ用于衡量两水平研究中参数估计的精确性。研究者在重视λj和λ点估计的同时,应重视其区间估计。Delta法近年来被广泛应用于求解信度的置信区间。本文针对现有的两水平研究中λj和λ置信区间估计方法的局限,介绍了简单而精确地估计λj和λ置信区间的方法。实例表明,相对于Raykov等人介绍的方法,新方法操作起来更简单,得出的结果也更精确。
出处 《教育测量与评价(理论版)》 2014年第4期10-14,共5页 Educational measurement and evaluation
基金 聊城大学教学改革项目"心理学定量研究方法课程群建设"(LDJG201214) 全国教育科学"十二五"规划2012年教育部重点课题"我国高校教师工作倦怠的类型学研究--基于现代测量学视角"(DIA120273)研究成果
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1杨英,龙立荣,周丽芳.授权风险考量与授权行为:领导-成员交换和集权度的作用[J].心理学报,2010,42(8):875-885. 被引量:37
  • 2Bonett,D. G. Varying coefficient meta -analyticmethods for alpha reliability [J]. Psychological Methods, 2010(15):368-385.
  • 3Woods,C. M. Confidence intervals for gamma-familyof ordinal association [J]. Psychological Methods,2007 (12):185-204.
  • 4叶宝娟,温忠麟.单维测验合成信度三种区间估计的比较[J].心理学报,2011,43(4):453-461. 被引量:46
  • 5Zou,G. Y. Towards using confidence intervals tocompare correlations [J]. Psychological Methods, 2007( 12):399-413.
  • 6Heck,R, H., & Thomas, S. L. An introduction tomultilevel modeling techniques [M]. New York: Routledge,2009.
  • 7Raykov, T., & Penev,S. Evaluation of reliabilitycoefficients for two-level models via latent variable analysis [J].Structural Equation Modeling, 2010(17): 629-641.
  • 8Laenen, A., Alonso, A., Molenberghs, G.,&Vangeneugden, T. A family of measures to evaluate scalereliability in a longitudinal setting [J]. Journal of the RoyalStatistical Society, 2009( 172) : 237^253.
  • 9Laenen, A., Alonso, A.,Molenberghs. G” &Vangeneugden, T. Reliability of a longitudinal sequence ofscale ratings [J]. Psychometrika, 2009(74): 49-64.
  • 10Raykov, T., & Penev, S. Estimation of maximalreliability for multiple -component instruments in multileveldesigns [J]. British Journal of Mathematical and StatisticalPsychology, 2009(62) : 129 -142.

二级参考文献53

  • 1屠金路,金瑜,王庭照.bootstrap法在合成分数信度区间估计中的应用[J].心理科学,2005,28(5):1199-1200. 被引量:12
  • 2Leana, C. R. (1986). Predictors and consequences of delegation. Academy of Management Journal, 29, 754-774.
  • 3Liden, R. C., & Graen, G. B. (1980). Generalizability of the vertical dyad linkage model of leadership. Academy of Management Journal, 23, 451-465.
  • 4Liden, R. C., Sparrowe, R. T., & Wayne, S. J. (1997). Leader-member exchange theory: The past and potential for the future. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 15, 47-119.
  • 5Lindell, M. K., & Brandt, C. J. (2000). Climate quality and climate consensus as mediators of the relationship between organizational antecedents and outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 331-348.
  • 6Littrel, R. F. (2007). Influences on employee preferences for empowerment practices by the "ideal manager" in China. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 31, 87-110.
  • 7Mann, H. H. (2006). Empowerment in terms of theoretical perspectives: Exploring a typology of the process and components across disciplines. Journal of Community Psychology, 34, 523-540.
  • 8Manz, C., & Sims, H. (1993). Leading workers to lead themselves: The external leadership of self-managed work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 32, 106-128.
  • 9Marcus, B., & Schuler, H. (2004). Antecedents of counterproductive behavior at work: A general perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 647-660.
  • 10Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20, 709-734.

共引文献81

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部