期刊文献+

艾司西酞普兰治疗惊恐障碍的疗效和安全性系统评价 被引量:11

Efficacy and Safety of Escitalopram and Paroxetine for Panic Disorder: A Systematic review
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的系统评价艾司西酞普兰与帕罗西汀治疗成人惊恐障碍的疗效与安全性。方法通过计算机检索及手工检索,以艾司西酞普兰(escitalopram)、帕罗西汀(paroxetine)、惊恐障碍(panic disorder)为检索词,全面收集中国知网全文数据库(CNKI)、中国维普全文数据库(VIP)、中国生物医学文献数据库(CBM disc)、万方全文数据库自创刊起关于艾司西酞普兰与帕罗西汀治疗惊恐障碍的临床随机对照试验(RCT)。对最终纳入的RCT按照Cochrane协作网系统评价的方法,严格评价纳入研究质量,对同质性研究采用Revman 5.0.2软件进行统计分析。结果纳入8个RCT,共包括716名受试对象。治疗第1周、第2周和第4周末艾司西酞普兰组的有效性得分均显著高于帕罗西汀组,有统计学意义[第1周末,MD=-1.93,95%CI(-2.68,-1.19),P=0.57;第2周末,MD=-4.6,95%CI(-6.51,-2.69),P<0.000 01;第4周末,MD=-1.2,95%CI(-1.98,-0.43),P=0.35];治疗第6周和第8周后艾司西酞普兰组与帕罗西汀组的有效性差异均无统计学意义[第6周末,MD=-0.74,95%CI(-1.53,0.04),P=0.98;第8周末,MD=-0.55,95%CI(-1.21,0.12),P=0.72];疗程结束后的终末治愈率艾司西酞普兰组与帕罗西汀组的差异无统计学意义[RR=0.89,95%CI(0.72,1.09),P=0.59];在分析的所有不良反应报告中,艾司西酞普兰组与帕罗西汀组所有不良反应项目差异均无统计学意义。结论艾司西酞普兰治疗成人惊恐障碍的长期疗效与帕罗西汀相当,但起效快于帕罗西汀,且具有良好的耐受性和安全性。 Objective To assess the efficacy and safety of escitalopram and paroxetine for treating adult panic disorder. Methods The randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of escitalopram and paroxetine for treating adult panic disorder were retrieved in the China Nation- al Knowledge Internet (CNKI),CQVIP,Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM),Wanfang database from their establishment. The quality of the included RCTs was strictly assessed according to the Cochrane collaboration network systematic evaluation method and the homogeneity RCTs were performed the statistical analysis by the RevMan 5.0. 2 software. Results 8 RCTs involving 716 subjects were included. The results of meta analysis showed that the effectiveness scores at the end of 1- week, 2- week and 4- week treatment in the escitalopram group were significantly higher than those in the paroxetine group [at the end of 1-week treatment MD=-1.93, 95%CI (-2.68,-1.19),P=O. 57;at the end of 2-week treatment MD= -4.6,95%C1(-6.51,-2.69),P 〈 0.000 01;at the end of 4-week treatment MD=-1.2,95%CI(-1.98,-0.43),P=0.35].But after 6-week and 8-week treatment there was no statistically significant difference in the effectiveness between the escitalopram group and the paroxetine group [ at the end of 6- week treatment MD= -0.74,95%CI (-1.53,0.04),P=0.98;at the end of 8-week treatment MD= -0.55,95%CI(-0.72,1.09), P=0. 72] ;the final cure rate after therapy in the escitalopram group and the paroxetine group had no statistically significant difference [RR=O. 89,95% CI (0.72,1.09), P=0. 59 ]. Among all the analyzed adverse reactions,the differences of the adverse reaction items had no statistical difference between the escitalopram group and the paroxetine group. Conclusion The long term efficacy of escitalo- pram for treating adult panic disorder is equivalent to that of paroxetine, but is more rapid in effect onset than paroxetine and has bet- ter tolerability and safety.
出处 《中国药业》 CAS 2014年第8期16-19,共4页 China Pharmaceuticals
基金 安徽省科技厅年度重点项目 项目编号:11040606M193
关键词 艾司西酞普兰 帕罗西汀 惊恐障碍 系统评价 META分析 escitalopram paroxetine panic disorder systematic review meta analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献28

  • 1Baldwin DS, Anderson IM, Nutt D J, et al. Evidence - based guidelines for the pharmacological treatment of anxiety disorders: recommendations from the British Association for Psychopharmacology [J]. J Psychopharmacol, 2005,19 (6) :567 - 596.
  • 2Culpepper I,. Identifying and treating panic disorder in primary care[J]. Clin Psychiatry, 2004,65 (Suppl 5 ) : 19 - 23.
  • 3刘协和.精神病学[M].第4版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2001:457-461.
  • 4Demyttenanere K, Bruffaerts R, Posada - Villa J, et al. Prevalence, severity, and unmet need for treatment of mental disorders in the world health organiza- tion world mental health surveys[J]. JAMA,2004,291 (21 ) :2 581 - 2 590.
  • 5Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists Clinical Prac- tice Guidelines Team for Panic Disorder and Agoraphobia. Australian and New Zealand clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of panic disorder and agoraphobia[J]. Aust NZ J Psychiatry,2003,37(6) :641 -656.
  • 6Bandelow B, Zohar J, Hollander E, et al. World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry (WFSBP) guidelinesfor the pharmacological treat- ment of anxiety, obsessive - compulsive and post - traumatic stress disor- ders -first revision[J ]. World J Biol Psychiatry,2008,9 (4) :248 -312.
  • 7American Psychiatric Association (2009). Treatment of patients with panic disorder [EB/OL]. [2012 - 03 - 25]. http://www, psychiatryon line. com/pracGuide/pracGui - deTopic_9, aspx.
  • 8Nardi AE, Valenca AM, Freire RC, et al. Psychopharmacotherapy of panic disorder: 8- week randomized trial with clonazepam and paroxetine [J]. Braz J Med Biol Res, 2011,44 : 366 - 373.
  • 9Sohita Dhillon, Lesley J Scott, Greg L P|osker. Escitalopram: A Review of its Use in the Management of Anxiety Disorders [J]. CNS Drugs,2006, 20 (9) :763 - 790.
  • 10中华医学会精神科分会.中国精神障碍分类与诊断标准(第三版)[M].济南:山东科学技术出版社,2001.75-8.

二级参考文献94

  • 1马希威,王立新,马振霞.50例惊恐障碍的临床特征分析[J].四川精神卫生,2005,18(2):102-102. 被引量:2
  • 2肖融,吴薇莉,张伟.惊恐障碍的病因学特征[J].中国临床康复,2005,9(48):111-113. 被引量:9
  • 3American Psychiatry Association. Panic Disorder. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. Fourth Edition [ M] . American Psychiatry Association. Washington DC, 1994:397-403.
  • 4Kessler R, Chiu W, Jin R, et al. The epidemiology of panic attacks, panic disorder, and agoraphobia in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication [ J ] . Arch Gen Psychiatry, 2006, 63 (4): 415-424.
  • 5刘协和.惊恐障碍[M].∥沈渔村.精神病学.第四版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2001:457-460.
  • 6Working Group on Panic Disorder. Practice guideline for the treatment of patients with panic disorder [ J ] . Am J Psychiatry 1998, 155: suppl: 1-34.
  • 7KatonWJ. Panic Disorder [ J ] . New Engl J Med, 2006, 354 : 2360 - 2367.
  • 8Bandelow B, Kaiya H. Drug Treatment for Panic Disorder [J] . Int Congress Series, 2006, (1287) : 288 -292.
  • 9Stahl SM, Gergel I, Li D. Escitalopram in the Treatment of Panic Disorder: A Randomized, Double-Blind, PlaceboControlled Trial [J] . J Clin Psychiatry, 2003, 64:1322 - 1327.
  • 10Bandelow B, Behnke B, Lenoir S, et al. Sertraline versus Paroxetine in the Treatment of Panic Disorder: An Acute, Double-Blind Noninferiority Comparison [ J ] . J Clin Psychiatry, 2004, 65:405-413.

共引文献92

同被引文献124

引证文献11

二级引证文献46

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部