摘要
分析了抽象行政行为的主要类型,主要包括部门垄断、地区封锁、强制联合限制竞争、行政强制交易这四种类型。认为我国现有的解决抽象行政行为垄断问题的方法存在多重缺陷。应采用立法听证的方式保证抽象行政行为的作出不违反反垄断法的规定;应建立对抽象行政行为的司法审查制度,使违反反垄断法的抽象行政行为能接受法院的审查;应构建反垄断私人诉讼制度,在抽象行政行为限制竞争产生损害后果时,使受损者有救济渠道。
Abstract administrative acts may bring many antitrust problems, including sectional monopolization, regional blockade, compulsory associated trade restriction and forced transaction. The present methods to solve these problems have multiple defects. The paper recommends that legislative hearings be taken to ensure that abstract administrative acts obey the antitrust law, abstract administrative acts go into judicial review proce- dures, and private litigation system of antitrust be constructed so that there will be a relief channel for victims in case of a serious consequence.
出处
《河南工业大学学报（社会科学版）》
2014年第1期70-75,共6页
Journal of Henan University of Technology:Social Science Edition
基金
2011年湖南省博士生科研创新项目(CX2011B037)
关键词
抽象行政行为
反垄断
立法听证
司法审查
私人诉讼
abstract administrative act
antitrust
legislative hearings
judicial review
private litigation
