期刊文献+

内幕交易司法解释中预定交易计划条款探讨——以美国证监会10b5—1(C)规则为视角展开 被引量:2

The Judicial Interpretation of China's Preplanned Trades Article from the Perspective of SEC Rule 10b5-1(c)
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为满足公司内部人合理证券交易的同时免受内幕交易责任追究的需要,美国证监会制定10b5-1(C)规则,对事先制定有交易计划的公司内部人按计划实施的证券交易,享有豁免内幕交易法律责任的保护,但同时规定了应遵循的原则和条件。我国最高人民法院、最高人民检察院2011年颁布"内幕交易司法解释",其预定交易计划条款效法美国10b5-1(C)规则,旨在建立内幕交易刑事责任豁免制度。但该条款过于简单,易于为内幕交易者逃避法律制裁提供借口并可能使惩治证券期货内幕交易违法犯罪的目的落空。本文在论述10b5-1(C)规则起源、内容构成、实践中可能存在漏洞基础上,提出若干完善我国相应规则的建议。 To afford the corporate insiders the immunities from the charge of insider dealing while they make legal securities trading, the SEC enacted the rule 10b5-1(c) to protect the insiders' preplanned trades from prosecution on some conditions and one principle. The preplanned trading article of the judicial interpretation relating to the insider trading, published in 2011 by Supreme People's Court and Supreme People's procuratorate, aims to construct the immunities to the criminal liability of engaging in insider trading or leaking insider intbrmation. But the article is so simple that it not only may provide the insider traders an excuse to evade the punishment but also may fail the whole insider trading law and regulations. The author proposed some suggestions on how to perfect the article after elaborating on the origin, the contents and the loopholes of its U.S counterpart, the rule 10b5-1 (c).
作者 郑晖
出处 《证券市场导报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第4期71-78,共8页 Securities Market Herald
关键词 内幕交易 SEC 规则10b5—1(C) 预订计划交易 insider trading, SEC, rule 10b5-1(c), preplanned trades
  • 相关文献

参考文献30

  • 1美国《证券法》第24(a)节.
  • 2《证券交易法》第32(a)节.
  • 3高西庆,夏丹.证监会在解释和发展证券法中的作用[J].证券市场导报,2006(4):4-11. 被引量:4
  • 4Alan Palnfiter, "Securities Regulation, Examples & Explanations" [M], Wolters Kluwer Law & Business 2011, Fifth Edition, p508.
  • 5Alan Palmiter, "Securities Regulation, Examples & Explanations" [M], Wolters Kluwer Law & Business 2011, Fifth Edition, p30-31.
  • 6Bule Chip Stamp v. Manor Drug Store, 421 U.S. 723 (1975).
  • 7William K.S. Wang, Marc I. Steinberg, "Insider Trading" [M], 3 rd Edition, Oxford University Press, 2010: p141-142.
  • 8United States v. Chiarella, 588 F.2d 1358, 1369 n.16 (2d Cir. 1978).
  • 9William K.S. Wang, Marc I. Steinberg, "Insider Trading" [M], 3 rd Edition, Oxford University Press, 2010: p169-187.
  • 10Larry D. Soderquist, Theresa A. Gabaldon, "Securities Law" , 4 th edition [M], Foundation Press, 2011: P153-157.

二级参考文献7

  • 1[美]考克斯,希尔曼,兰格沃特.证券管理法:案例与资料[M].北京:中信出版社,2003.
  • 2Loss,Louis and Joel Seligman.Securities Regulation.3rd ed.Boston:Little,Brown and Company,1991.p.3485.
  • 3Hazen,Thomas Lee.The Law of Securities Regulation.4th ed.St.Paul:West Group,2002.Vol.2.p.601.
  • 4Joseph A.Grundfest,Disimplying Private Rights of Action under the Federal Securities Laws:The Commission's Authority,107 Harv.L.Rev.961 (1994).
  • 5Thomas A.McGrath,Ⅲ,The Rise and Fall (and Rise?) of Information-based Insider Trading Enforcement,Happy Birthday Rule 10b-5:50 Years of Antifraud Regulation,61 Fordham L.Rev.S127 (1993).
  • 6[美]拉特那.证券管理法[M].北京:法律出版社,1999.
  • 7Ryan D.Adams,"Where There Is A Will,There Is A Way":The Securities and Exchange Commission's Adoption of Rule 10b-5,47 Loy.L.Rev.1133 (2001).

同被引文献16

  • 1Karl T. Muth, Avarice Aforethought. Insider Trating and 1065- 1 Plans[J]. 10 U. C. Davis Bus. L. J. 2009, 65.
  • 2Stanley Veliotis. Rule 10h5- 1 Trading Plans and Insiders Incentive to Misrepresent[J]. American Business Law Journal,2010,47.
  • 3Alan D. Jagolinzer. SCc Rule 10b.5 - 1 and Insiders' Strategic Trade [J]. Management Science, February, 2009.
  • 4Jesse M. Fried. Insider Abstention [J]. Yale Law Journal, 2003, 13.
  • 5刘成墉.内幕交易免责抗辩事由之探讨[J].铭传大学法学论丛,2011(15).
  • 6Elam V. Neidorff, 502 F. Supp. 2d 988 (2007).
  • 7Elam V. Neidorff, 544 F. 3d 921 (2008).
  • 8In re Miva, Ine, 544 F. Supp. 2d 1310 (2008).
  • 9In reMiva, Ine, 658 F. 3d 1282 (2011).
  • 10SEC V. Lipson, 129 F. Supp. 2d 1148 (2001).

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部