期刊文献+

选择性痔上黏膜切除术治疗重度混合痔的临床观察 被引量:8

Clinical observation of selective hemorrhoid mucosal resection in the treatment of severe mixed hemorrhoid
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的观察选择性痔上黏膜切除术(TST)治疗Ⅲ、Ⅳ度混合痔的临床疗效。方法将100例Ⅲ、Ⅳ度混合痔患者随机分为治疗组及对照组各50例,分别予以选择性痔上黏膜切除术及传统外剥内扎术治疗,观察两种术式治疗的术中情况、疗效和并发症情况。结果两组患者治疗后总有效率均为100%,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);治疗组在术后疼痛、创面出血、肛缘水肿、尿潴留方面与对照组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);住院时间、病人满意度、恢复正常工作等方面与对照组比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论选择性痔上黏膜切除术是治疗Ⅲ、Ⅳ度混合痔安全、有效的手术方式。 Objective To observe the clinical therapeutic effect of selective hemorrhoid mucosal resection in the treatment ofⅢ and Ⅳdegree mixed hemorrhoid. Methods One-hundred patients with III and IV degree mixed hemorrhoid were randomly divided into the treatment group or the control group, and were treated by selective hemorrhoid mucosal resection or traditional Milligan-Morgan operation. Intraoperative circumstance, therapeutic effect, and complication were observed and compared between the two groups. Results Both groups have an overall effective rate of 100%, with superiorities of the treatment group in postoperative pain, wound bleeding, anal edge edema, urine retention, hospital stay, patient satisfaction, and resuming to normal work ( all P 〈 0.05 ). Conclusion Selective hemorrhoid mucosal resection is safe and effective in the treatment of stage ⅢandⅣ mixed hemorrhoid.
作者 肖忠华
出处 《微创医学》 2014年第2期183-185,共3页 Journal of Minimally Invasive Medicine
关键词 重度混合痔 选择性痔上黏膜切除术 Severe mixed hemorrhoid Selective hemorrhoid mucosal resection
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献13

  • 1任东林,罗湛滨,赵杰.吻合器痔上粘膜环切钉合术1000例临床总结[J].中国中西医结合外科杂志,2005,11(3):204-205. 被引量:28
  • 2痔临床诊治指南(2006版)[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2006,9(5):461-463. 被引量:2118
  • 3中华医学会外科学分会结直肠肛门外科学组 中华中医药学会肛肠病专业委员会 中国中西医结合学会结直肠肛门病专业委员会.痔临床诊治指南(草案).中华胃肠外科杂志,2006,9(5):461-463.
  • 4Mehigan BJ,Monson JRT,Hartley JE. Stapling procedure for haemorrhoids versus Milligan-Morgan Haemorrhoidectomy: randomised controlled trial[J].Lancet,2000,355(9206):782- 785.
  • 5Fazio VW. Early promise of stapling for haemorrhoidectomy[J]. Lancet,2000,355(9206) :768-769.
  • 6Ganio E, Altomare DF, Gabrielli F, et al. Prospective randomized multicentre trial comparing stapledwith open haemorrhoid- ectomy[J]. Br J Surg, 2001,88(5) : 669.
  • 7Dodi G, Pietroletti R, Milito G, et al. Bleeding, incontinence, pain and constipation alter STARR transanal double stapling rectotomy for obstructed defecation[J]. Dis Colon Rectum,2003,7(3):148-153.
  • 8Peseatori M, Dodi G,Salafia C, et al. Rectovaginal fistula after double-stapled transanal rectotomy (STARR) for obstructed defaecation[J].Int J Coloreetal Dis, 2005,20 (1) : 83-85.
  • 9Bassi R, Rademacher J, Savoia R. Rectovaginal fistula after STARR procedure complicated by hematoma of the posterior vaginal wall[J]. Tech Coloproctol,2006,10(4):361-363.
  • 10LONGO A.Treatment of hemorrhoidal disease by reduction of mucosa and hemorrhoidal prolapse with a circular suturing device:a new procedure[M].Rome:Proceedings of the 6th World Congress of Endoscopic Surgery,1998:3.

共引文献2254

同被引文献63

引证文献8

二级引证文献28

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部