期刊文献+

形式化模型检验在飞机系统演绎式安全分析中的应用研究

The Applied Research of Formal Model Checking in Aircraft System Deductive Safety Analysis
原文传递
导出
摘要 随着飞机系统复杂度的日益增长,对飞机设计人员和安全性分析人员能力的提升也提出了相应要求。但是传统的安全性分析方法都存在一些弊端:高度主观并且依赖分析人员的技能和经验,而且不太可能做到完整无错。形式化验证技术,如模型检验方法,能够很好地处理复杂度较高的系统,并且能在一定程度上克服这些弊端。本文运用模型检验的方法对系统进行演绎式安全性分析,得到定性的结果。 With the growing complexity of the aircraft systems, it requires an adequate increase in the capability of aircraft designers and safety engineers. However, there're some drawbacks of traditional safety analysis techniques: highly subjective and dependent on the skill of the analysts, hardly error- free and complete. Formal verification techniques, such as model checking methods, have the ability of dealing with systems of such highly complexity and overcoming these drawbacks to a certain extent. This paper uses the model checking method, conducts the deductive analysis of certain system and obtains the qualitative results.
出处 《飞机设计》 2014年第1期47-51,共5页 Aircraft Design
基金 国家自然科学基金与民航局联合资助项目(60879001) 江苏省自然科学基金资助项目(BK2009378) 南京航空航天大学基本科研业务费专项科研项目(NS2010179)
关键词 飞机系统 演绎式安全分析 形式化模型检验 aircraft system deductive safety analysis formal model checking
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Gomes A, Mota A, Sampaio A, et al. Constructive model-based analysis for safety assessment [J]. Springer-Verlag, 2012 (14) : 673-702.
  • 2吴海桥,刘超,葛红娟,王华伟.基于模型检验的飞机系统安全性分析方法研究[J].中国民航大学学报,2012,30(2):17-20. 被引量:6
  • 3Bozzano M, Villafiorita A, Akertund O, et al. ESACS: an integrated methodology for design and safety analysis of complex systems. [C]. In proceedings of ESREL, Balkema publisher, 2003.
  • 4Akerlund O, Bierber P, Boede E. ISAAC, a framework for integrated safety analysis of functional, geometrical and human asepects[R]. In proceedings of ERTS, Toulouse, 2006.
  • 5Sartor V, Gauthier J. Model based safety assessment in dassauh aviation. [A]. In: Model-based Safety Assessment (Journ es MISSA)[C|, 2010.
  • 6Joshi A, Miller S P, Whalen M, et al. A proposal for model-based safety analysis[C]. 24th Digital Avionics Systems Conference. Washington, D.C., 2005.
  • 7Joshi A, Heimdahl M P E. Model-based safety analysis of simulink models using SCADE design verifer[A]. 24th Internati.onal Conference on Computer Safety, Reliability, and Security[C], 2005.
  • 8Cavada R, Cimatti A, Keighren G, et al. NuSMV 2.5 Manual[EB/ OL]. Italy: FBK, 2010.

二级参考文献12

  • 1CCAR-25-R3,运输类飞机适航标准[S].中国民用航空总局,2005.
  • 2CCAR-23-R3,正常类、实用类、特技类和通勤类飞机适航规定[S].中国民用航空总局,2005.
  • 3CCAR-29-R1,运输类旋翼航空器适航规定[S].中国民用航空总局,2002.
  • 4CCAR-27-R1,正常类旋翼航空器适航规定[S].中国民用航空总局,2002.
  • 5JOHN RUSHBY.Formalism in Safety Cases[C]//Making Systems Safer.London:Springer-Verlag London Limited,2010:3-17.
  • 6魡KERLUND O,BIEBER P,B魻DE E,et al.ESACS:an IntegratedMethodology for Design and Safety Analysis of Complex Systems[C]//European Safety and Reliability Conference(ESREL).Toulouse:Balke-ma publisher,2003:203-221.
  • 7魡KERLUND O,BIEBER P,B魻DE E,et al.ISAAC,a Framework forIntegrated Safety Analysis of Functional,Geometrical and Human Aspects[C]//Electronic Reciprocal Transfer System,Toulouse.France:2006:145-162.
  • 8VAL魪RIE SARTOR,JEAN GAUTHIER.Model Based Safety Assess-ment In Dassault Aviation[C]//Model-based Safety Assessmen(t Journ-ées MISSA):2010,12:11-15.
  • 9LAURENT SAGASPE NICOLAS MAY.MBSA in Aeronautics Experi-ence Feed-back on modelling applications[C]//Model Based SafetyAssessment Workshop(MBSAW2011),Toulouse.France:2011:53-59.
  • 10ANJALI JOSHI,MICHAEL W WHALEN,MATS P E HEIMDAHL.Model-Based Safety Analysis Final Report[R].NASA/CR-2006-213953,NASA Contractor Report,2006.

共引文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部