摘要
中国机读目录(CNMARC)对责任者附注的处理方法比较混乱,一是在有专指字段的情况下使用通用字段处理责任者附注;二是对304和314这两个专指字段的用法缺乏统一而明确的规定;三是对某些附注内容虽有字段使用说明,但其随意性很大,缺少令人信服的理由。
The processing method of the author annotation is more chaotic in China Machine Readable Catalogue （CNMARC）, the first is that using the general field to process the author annotation in the condition of existing the specific field; the second is that there is no unified and clear regulation of the usage about 304 field and 314 field which are specific fields; the third is that some annotation contents have the operating instruction of the field, but its casualness is very large and it lacks the convincing reason.
出处
《图书馆建设》
CSSCI
北大核心
2014年第4期53-54,共2页
Library Development
