期刊文献+

面向复杂评价模型的证据推理方法 被引量:2

Evidential Reasoning Approach for Solving Complex Evaluation Models
下载PDF
导出
摘要 证据推理方法针对多层结构的属性合成采用递归方式,其合成次数为评价属性树的分支结点个数,合成计算量较大.为减少计算量,文中提出一种非递归方式的合成方法,并对比两种合成方式的时间复杂度.为探究非递归方式处理各类不同置信结构分布的准确性和非线性特性,文中在三层结构的评价模型中,按照置信结构分布为和谐、准和谐和冲突分别计算综合属性的置信度和效用值,从公式推导和实验结果对比的角度分析两种合成方式的非线性特性,从相对误差的角度分析非递归方式计算结果的准确性.实验结果与算例证明文中方法的有效性. Since the attribute aggregation of the evidential reasoning approach with multiple-level hierarchical structures is implemented in a recursive way, the aggregation times are the number of the branch nodes of attribute tree, which results in a large amount of calculation. To reduce the amount of calculation, a non-recursive aggregation approach is proposed and its time complexity is compared with that of the recursive approach. To explore the accuracy and the nonlinear characteristics of the non-recursive approach to dealing with different belief distributions, the belief degrees and the utilities of the aggregated attribute are calculated in terms of the belief structures of harmony, quasi-harmony and conflict, respectively. The nonlinear characteristics of the two aggregation approaches are analyzed based on the comparison of formula derivation and experimental results, and the accuracy of the non-recursive approach is examined from the angle of relative errors. The experimental results and the numeric example show the effectiveness of the proposed approach.
出处 《模式识别与人工智能》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2014年第4期313-326,共14页 Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence
基金 国家自然科学基金青年项目(No.61300026 61300104) 国家杰出青年科学基金项目(No.70925004) 福建省教育厅A类科技项目(No.JA10035 JA13036)资助
关键词 证据推理 复杂评价模型 递归方式 非递归方式 非线性特性 Evidential Reasoning Complex Evaluation Model Recursive Way Non-recursive Way Nonlinear Characteristic
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1] Yang J B, Xu D L. On the Evidential Reasoning Algorithm for Mul- tiple Attribute Decision Analysis under Uncertainty. IEEE Trans on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 2002, 32(3 ) : 289-304.
  • 2杨善林,丁帅,褚伟.一种基于效用和证据理论的可信软件评估方法[J].计算机研究与发展,2009,46(7):1152-1159. 被引量:47
  • 3周谧,刘心报,杨剑波.基于改进的证据推理方法的企业R&D成果验收评估[J].合肥工业大学学报(自然科学版),2009,32(8):1183-1188. 被引量:7
  • 4Wang Y M, Yang J B, Xu D L. Environmental Impact Assessment Using the Evidential Reasoning Approach. European Journal of Op- erational Research, 2006, 174(3): 1885-1913.
  • 5Wang Y M, Elhag T M S. Evidential Reasoning Approach for Bridge Condition Assessment. Expert Systems with Applications, 2008, 34 ( 1 ) : 689-699.
  • 6Wang Y M, Yang J B, Xu D L, et al. Consumer Preference Predic- tion by Using a Hybrid Evidential Reasoning and Belief Rule-Based Methodology. Expert Systems with Applications, 2009, 36 (4):8421-8430.
  • 7Wang Y M, Yang J B, Xu D L, et al. The Evidential Reasoning Approach for Multiple Attribute Decision Analysis Using Interval Be- lief Degrees. European Journal of Operational Research, 2006, 175 1 ) : 35-66.
  • 8Xu D L, Yang J B, Wang Y M. The Evidential Reasoning Approach for Multi-attribute Decision Analysis under Interval Uncertainty. Eu- ropean Journal of Operational Research, 2006, 174 (3) : 1914- 1943.
  • 9Guo M, Yang J B, Chin K S, et al. Evidential Reasoning Approach for Multi-attribute Decision Analysis under Both Fuzzy and Interval Uncertainty. IEEE Trans on Fuzzy Systems, 2009, 17 (3) : 683 - 697.
  • 10Yang J B, Xu D L. Nonlinear Information Aggregation via Eviden- tial Reasoning in Multi-attribute Decision Analysis under Uncer- tainty. IEEE Trans on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 2002, 32 (3) : 376-393.

二级参考文献59

共引文献72

同被引文献7

引证文献2

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部