期刊文献+

教师心理虐待大学生回顾量表的编制 被引量:2

Development of Teachers' Psychological Abuse History Scale for College Students
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的编制教师心理虐待大学生回顾量表(TPAHS),并检验其信效度。方法参考已有的研究和文献、通过开放式调查等方法,编制了40个项目的初始问卷。采用方便取样,随机对哈尔滨5所高校794名大学生进行TPAHS测验,通过项目分析筛选题目,对数据进行探索性因素分析和验证性因素分析。另选取同质被试150名大学生进行TPAHS测验,间隔2周后进行重测。结果探索性因素分析获取了言语暴力、躯体虐待、剥夺和忽视4个因素,共21个项目,累计方差解释率为55.58%。验证性因素分析得出,各拟合指标分别为χ2/df=1.79,CFI=0.91,TLI=0.90,SRMr=0.05,RMSEA=0.05(P=0.84),该模型拟合良好。总量表的Cronbachα系数为0.91,4个因素的α系数分别为0.67~0.87之间;总量表的重测信度为0.86,4个因素的重测信度为0.52~0.85。结论教师心理虐待大学生回顾量表具有良好的信度和效度。 Objective To develop the Teachers'Psychological Abuse History Scale(TPAHS)for college students and test its reliabili- ty and validity. Methods Reference of existing research and literature, through the open investigation,40 project initial questionnaire was complied. Using convenient sampling, random of TPAHS test was conducted among 794 college students of 5 universities in Harbin. The scale was revised through item analysis. The construct validity of the scale was tested through exploratory factor analysis and confirm- atory factor analysis. The test-retest reliability was tested by 150 students 2 week later. Results Exploratory factor analysis indicated that TPAHS was corr^posed of 21 items and 4 factors, including verbal abuse, physical abuse, deprivation and neglect, and could explain 55.58% of the total variance. The fit indices were x2/df = 1.79, CFI = 0.91,TLI = 0. 90, SRMr = 0.05, RMSEA = 0. 05 ( P = 0.84 ), the model had good fitting indices. The Cronbach α of the whole scale was 0.91, and each factor ranged from 0. 67 - 0.87 ; The test-retest re- liability coefficient of the TPAHS was 0.86, and each factor ranged from 0. 52 - 0.85. Conclusion The Teachers' Psychological Abuse History Scale has good reliability and validity.
出处 《中国健康心理学杂志》 2014年第3期361-363,共3页 China Journal of Health Psychology
基金 黑龙江省人文社会科学项目(编号:12512118) 哈尔滨师范大学人文社会科学预研项目(编号:SYY2008-03)
关键词 教师心理虐待 大学生 量表编制 心理健康 信度 效度 Teachers ' psychological abuse College students Development of scale Mental health Reliability Validity
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献50

共引文献138

同被引文献19

引证文献2

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部