期刊文献+

《左传》叙事视角的复杂多样性原因探究

Narrative Perspective of Complex and Diverse Reasons on The Tso Chuan
原文传递
导出
摘要 《左传》叙事视角复杂多样,包括解经者视角、史官文化视角、全知全觉视角、限知限觉视角等不同类型。经典的解经视角与史官文化视角证明《左传》与《春秋》关系密切,但又不是简单的为解经而作;全知全觉叙事视角与限知限觉叙事视角的并用,尤其是限知限觉叙事视角的广泛运用体现了《左传》叙事艺术的大大提高。综合分析,《左传》的编写存在一个不断扩充的过程,其性质也存在一个不断发展变化的过程,在编写之初它概主要参考《春秋》的编年体例以叙史为主。后来,具有儒家思想的学者为之增补了解经语、评论语等彰显《春秋》"微言大义"的言论,同时对《左传》的记事也增加了一些能够显示《春秋》经义的内容。 The Tso Chuan has complex and varied narrative perspectives, including the classic, historiographer culture perspective, limited perspective such as different types. Classic solution perspective with historiographer culture angle of view has proved in Tso Chuan, and closely related to the Spring and Autumn Annals, not simple for the classics; Narrative perspective and the limited feeling of omniscient all sleep know limit perception of narrative perspective and especially limited feeling the widespread application of narrative perspective reflects the Tso Chuan, narrative art is greatly increased. The writing of the comprehensive analysis of Tso Chuan, there is a process of constant expansion, the natureis also a process of constant development,.at the beginning of writing,it is the main reference of the Spring and Autumn Annals chronological style is given priority to with Syria's history. Later, with Confucian scholars as the supplement of the classics, comments and reveal the Spring and Autumn Annals 'how's sense of honor', the chronicle of Tso Chuan also added some able to display the content of the spring and autumn annals by righteousness.
作者 夏继先
机构地区 新乡学院
出处 《中华文化论坛》 北大核心 2014年第4期31-39,191,共9页 Journal of Chinese Culture
关键词 《左传》 叙事视角 复杂多样 意蕴阐证 Tso Chuan narrative perspective complex and diverse connotation interpretation.
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1严可均辑.全后汉文[M].商务印书馆,1999.132.
  • 2杨义.杨义文存·中国叙事学[M].人民出版社,1997.
  • 3纪昀.阅微草堂笔记[M].北京燕山出版社,2007.196.
  • 4林纾.左传撷华(卷上)[M].商务印书馆,1921.32.
  • 5王应麟撰,翁元圻注.困学纪闻·卷六[M].商务印书馆,1959.619.
  • 6韩席筹.左传分国集注[M].江苏人民出版社,1963.690.
  • 7冯李骅,陆浩评点.左绣[M].康熙善成堂刊本.
  • 8刘知几撰,浦起龙通释.史通通释[M].上海古籍出版社,2008.59.
  • 9司马迁.史记[M].北京:中华书局,1959..
  • 10胡念贻.《左传》的真伪和写作时代考辨[J].文史.1981,(11).

共引文献2232

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部