期刊文献+

大学教师“科研至上”行为的制度逻辑 被引量:7

Institutional Logic of the Faculty's Behavior of “Research Supremacy”
下载PDF
导出
摘要 大众化高等教育时代,在高等教育改革、新管理主义、市场经济的共同作用下,大学教师"科研至上"行为已经形成了一种普遍性的世界景观。从理性选择制度主义的视角来分析,目前中国大学教师所表现出的"科研至上"行为并不能单纯地被解释为教师个体行为,而是具有制度化和结构性的特点,有着广泛深厚的合法性基础和特定的制度逻辑。其中大学教师的聘任、晋升、激励、评估及声誉制度等影响并决定着教师的行为选择与发展策略。在大学教育范式变革的时代,关注"以学生为中心"的教育范式转型,需要考虑各种复杂因素的影响,重构大学教师发展制度。 In the era of mass higher education , the faculty's behavior of ?research supremacy" has become a worldwide prevalent phenomena under the multi-effect of higher education reform , neo-managerialism and market economy . From the angle of rational choice in institutionalism , Chinese faculty's current behavior of ?research supremacy"can't be simply explained as a personal behavior ;it is institutionalized and constitutive , having a wide and deep rightful foundation and specified institutional logic . The system of recruitment , promotion , prompting , and evaluation for faculty affects and decides their choices and developing strategies . All different kinds of complicated facts should be accounted for the design of students-centered teaching model in universities in order to build a beneficial institutional environment for teaching development and design a flexible policy institution as w ell .
作者 王俊
出处 《教师教育论坛》 2014年第2期54-58,共5页 Teacher Education Forum
基金 国家社科基金教育学2008年度一般课题"高校教师专业化发展及其组织模式:国际经验与本土实践"(编号:BIA08003)研究成果
关键词 大学教师 科研至上 理性选择 制度逻辑 教师发展 faculty research supremacy rational choice institutional logic teacher development
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献83

  • 1孙进.德国大学改革问题的组织理论解析[J].北京大学教育评论,2005,3(2):79-83. 被引量:6
  • 2Cai, Y. ( 2007 ). Academic staff integration in post-merger Chinese higher education, institutions. Tampere, Finland : Tampere University Press.
  • 3Chen, D. (2001). Restructuring through amalgamation in China. International Higher Education 25(8) : 15-16.
  • 4Chen, D. (2002). A study of the amalgamation of Chinese higher education institutions. Asia Pacific Education Review 3 ( 1 ) : 48-55.
  • 5Holtta, Seppo. (1998). The funding of universities in Finland: Towards goal-criented government steering. European Journal of Education. 33.
  • 6Gornitzka, A. & Maassen, P. (2000a). Hybrid steering approaches with respect to European higher education. Higher Education Policy 13 : 267-285.
  • 7Schwarz, S. & Westerheijden, D. (2004). Accreditation and evaluation in the European higher education area. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
  • 8Fulton, O. & Trow, M. ( 1974 ). Research activity in higher education. Sociology of Education 47 : 29-73.
  • 9Alpert, D. (1985). Performance and paralysis: The organizational context of the American research university. Journal of Higher Education 56: 241-281.
  • 10Fairweather, J. (1996). Faculty work and public trust: Restoring the value of teaching and public service in American academic life. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

共引文献330

同被引文献79

引证文献7

二级引证文献46

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部