摘要
目的 :比较个体化唇裂修复法与旋转推进法及下三角瓣法在设计原理上的相关性及差异。方法 :对 3种术式在健患侧唇上所做的切口设计、定点方法进行平面几何学的比较分析 ,并对 3种术式针对不同畸形特点的唇裂病例设计的合理性进行探讨。结果 :个体化唇裂修复法较旋转推进法和下三角瓣法的设计具有更宽的适应证和较强的应变功能。结论
Objective: To compare the relationship and differences between individual operative procedural design with the Millard and Tennison methods in cleft lip repair. Methods: The author specifically analyzed and compared the end point of incision on noncleft side of unilateral cleft lip in three kind of operative respectively. In addition, the operative design was discussed and found out to be more reasonable. Results: The individual operative procedural design have wider indication and adaptable to change and function than Millard and Tennison methods alone from the geometrical configuration point of view. Conclusion: Therefore, the author conclude that the individual operative procedural design is practical and applicable than other operative design in cleft lip repair.\;
出处
《华西口腔医学杂志》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2001年第1期28-31,共4页
West China Journal of Stomatology
基金
高等学校优秀青年教师教学和科研奖励基金资助项目
关键词
唇裂
个体化修复术式
旋转推进法
下三角瓣法
cleft lip\ \ individual procedure\ \ Millard method\ \ Tennison method